Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373907

Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016.

From "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016.
Date 2016-10-01 01:37 +0000
Organization O.W.L.
Message-ID <fhjagd.fjjgi8@perch.invalid> (permalink)
References (2 earlier) <nsmr9q$dqg$1@news.albasani.net> <hjgdasoe003.ae@perch.invalid> <nsn09g$41v$1@news.albasani.net> <hjgdauv9.t4ji@perch.invalid> <nsn1ks$41v$3@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2016-10-01, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 2016-10-01, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-09-30, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> articles 1657 since 2016-09-24 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Posters with most posts
>>>>>>> Posts   Poster  Posters 54
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Melzzzzz, you got a public key?
>>>>>>
>>>>> 
>>>>> Yes, but I have no intention to use it for usenet posts.
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>> You don't have to encrypt anything yourself.  It just lets you see all
>>>> the encrypted posts.  And if you don't want to tarnish that key, create
>>>> one just for cola.  Or not.  Whatever.
>>>>
>>> What's the point of that?
>>> 
>>
>> What's the point of encryption?  Is that what you mean?
>>
> 
> No, what's the point of encrypted posts?
> 

They are encrypted so Snit cannot read them.  Everybody else
who posts their public key will be able to read them.  Only
Snit and his socks will be left outside the door.

Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-30 21:10 +0000
  Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:56 -0400
  Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 22:11 +0000
    Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-30 23:08 +0000
      Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:20 +0000
        Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 00:33 +0000
          Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:45 +0000
            Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 00:57 +0000
              Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 01:37 +0000
                Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 01:42 +0000
                Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 01:51 +0000
                Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 22:26 -0400
              Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:21 -0600
      Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:25 -0400
        Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 00:36 +0000
          Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-01 06:46 -0400

csiph-web