Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #373910

Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016.

From	"Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.os.linux.advocacy
Subject	Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016.
Date	2016-10-01 01:51 +0000
Organization	O.W.L.
Message-ID	<ashjfdv803.a@perch.invalid> (permalink)
References	(4 earlier) <nsn09g$41v$1@news.albasani.net> <hjgdauv9.t4ji@perch.invalid> <nsn1ks$41v$3@news.albasani.net> <fhjagd.fjjgi8@perch.invalid> <nsn49g$7hq$2@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw

Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
> On 2016-10-01, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>> On 2016-10-01, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>> On 2016-10-01, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>> On 2016-09-30, Octavian W. Lagrange <olagrang@perch.invalid> wrote:
>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> wrote:
>>>>>>>>> articles 1657 since 2016-09-24 00:00:00 +0000 UTC
>>>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>>>> Posters with most posts
>>>>>>>>> Posts   Poster  Posters 54
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>>> Melzzzzz, you got a public key?
>>>>>>>>
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>> Yes, but I have no intention to use it for usenet posts.
>>>>>>> 
>>>>>>
>>>>>> You don't have to encrypt anything yourself.  It just lets you see all
>>>>>> the encrypted posts.  And if you don't want to tarnish that key, create
>>>>>> one just for cola.  Or not.  Whatever.
>>>>>>
>>>>> What's the point of that?
>>>>> 
>>>>
>>>> What's the point of encryption?  Is that what you mean?
>>>>
>>> 
>>> No, what's the point of encrypted posts?
>>> 
>>
>> They are encrypted so Snit cannot read them.  Everybody else
>> who posts their public key will be able to read them.  Only
>> Snit and his socks will be left outside the door.
>>
> I don't care about Snit and his socks... and what they think, what they
> write and everything related to them... bored to hell with Snit.
> 

What we are doing, we are doing for our own reasons.  Adding your key
is for your benefit, not ours.  We see your posts either way.  If you
don't mind seeing a newsgroup full of encrypted messages, that's fine.
The offer is a courtesy so that you are not subjected to that.  But
like I said, do as you wish.

Thread

Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-30 21:10 +0000
  Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 17:56 -0400
  Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-09-30 22:11 +0000
    Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-09-30 23:08 +0000
      Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:20 +0000
        Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 00:33 +0000
          Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 00:45 +0000
            Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 00:57 +0000
              Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 01:37 +0000
                Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 01:42 +0000
                Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. "Octavian W. Lagrange" <olagrang@perch.invalid> - 2016-10-01 01:51 +0000
                Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Silver Slimer <.m@nsn.s> - 2016-09-30 22:26 -0400
              Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. GreyCloud <Cumulus@mist.com> - 2016-09-30 20:21 -0600
      Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-09-30 20:25 -0400
        Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Melzzzzz <Melzzzzz@zzzzz.com> - 2016-10-01 00:36 +0000
          Re: Statistics on 30.9.2016. Chris Ahlstrom <OFeem1987@teleworm.us> - 2016-10-01 06:46 -0400

csiph-web