Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.os.linux.advocacy > #287261
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!us.feeder.erje.net!news.alt.net!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> |
| Newsgroups | comp.os.linux.advocacy |
| Subject | Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% |
| Date | Wed, 1 Apr 2015 19:20:34 +0000 (UTC) |
| Organization | ok by me, so long as it doesn't get out of hand |
| Lines | 33 |
| Message-ID | <bvhd03.apf3@rooftop.invalid> (permalink) |
| References | <mfcqrl$5iv$4@dont-email.me> <bbhvue93.ap3@rooftop.invalid> <mfgog7$34c$5@dont-email.me> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | boom.rooftop.invalid |
| User-Agent | tin/1.4-19991113 ("No Labels") (UNIX) (Linux/2.6.38-16-generic (x86_64)) |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.os.linux.advocacy:287261 |
Show key headers only | View raw
DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: > On 3/31/2015 5:52 PM, owl wrote: >> DFS <nospam@dfs.com> wrote: >>> <quote> >>> (And a side note: Visits from devices running Linux account for a number >>> equal to almost exactly 1 percent of all desktop traffic, although it >>> appears that the government lumps Linux in with the mobile category for >>> some reason.) >>> </quote> >> >>> http://www.zdnet.com/article/which-operating-systems-and-browsers-are-most-popular-in-the-u-s/ >> >> >>> Windows worldwide: ************************************************** >>> **************************************** >> >>> Linux worldwide: * >> >> >>> heh! Funny visual! >> >> Here, I plotted that for you >> http://i.imgur.com/65hvgOD.png > Beautiful! > Must've come out of the (b)owl(s) of LibreOffice. You have to work hard > to make MS Office graphs look that bad. It was supposed to be gray-scale, but teh Mack wouldn't cooperate. But R far surpasses anything DOZE OFFice can do :)
Back to comp.os.linux.advocacy | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-03-30 20:48 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-30 18:54 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 10:55 +0100
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% John Gohde <john.h.gohde@gmail.com> - 2015-03-31 04:54 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Desk Rabbit <me@example.com> - 2015-03-31 13:52 +0100
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% awoolmeyer@gmail.com - 2015-03-31 05:06 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-03-31 21:52 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 08:32 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 09:32 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% vallor <vallor@cultnix.org> - 2015-04-01 08:47 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 12:54 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Steve Carroll <fretwizzer@gmail.com> - 2015-04-01 18:27 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:13 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Slimer <slvrslmr@lv.c> - 2015-04-01 23:45 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-01 19:20 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 21:01 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 02:49 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-01 23:25 -0400
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% owl <owl@rooftop.invalid> - 2015-04-02 03:56 +0000
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% Debbie Ballard <debbie1ballard@gmail.com> - 2015-04-13 16:39 -0700
Re: More evidence of desktop Linux at 1% DFS <nospam@dfs.com> - 2015-04-13 20:04 -0400
csiph-web