Re: POTUS backs net neutrality

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!fu-berlin.de!uni-berlin.de!individual.net!not-for-mail
From	Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid>
Newsgroups	comp.misc
Subject	Re: POTUS backs net neutrality
Date	13 Nov 2014 11:26:26 GMT
Organization	Piglet's Pickles & Preserves
Lines	29
Message-ID	<ccjir2F3gslU2@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References	<m3rhtf$bb0$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ccdub2FjdsrU1@mid.individual.net> <m3sjq3$b1u$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m3t58b$b3n$1@dont-email.me> <slrnm64obo.mlc.anthonyg@ma.sdf.org> <20141112144629.47927cb5.rsw@therandymon.com> <87tx24l9ry.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <slrnm67bvv.dt.anthonyg@ma.sdf.org> <87ioikqiua.fsf@elektro.pacujo.net> <slrnm67j5a.f3l.anthonyg@ma.sdf.org>
Reply-To	usenet@huge.org.uk
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Trace	individual.net RcELfyTyS9PwUIBb7rO+pweaOvJnH129yYf2lEfQKEG9mKoD5u
Cancel-Lock	sha1:vY4OLiywuR2rbl9VkaX4Qk/jfF4=
X-No-Archive	Yes
User-Agent	slrn/pre1.0.0-16 (Linux)
Xref	csiph.com comp.misc:5622

Show key headers only | View raw

On 2014-11-12, Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> wrote:
> On Wed, 12 Nov 2014 22:12:13 +0200, Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> wrote:
>> Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org>:

[27 lines snipped]

>>> State legislation isn't going to solve this one. Net neutrality is one
>>> of those all or nothing things which needs to be handled on a federal
>>> level.
>>
>> You have a pretty limited view of the Internet. How do Canada,
>> Australia, France and Lithuania factor in the "federal level?"
>
> Thanks for telling me what I know. I'm so glad people like you exist to
> remind me of these things!
>
> Canada, Australia, France, and Lithuania are different countries. I
> doubt that Comcast operates there...but I could be wrong, I suppose. And
> not at all set up legally like the United States. That's what we're
> discussing here, right? US law?

You are aware that Telecommunications standards are defined by the ITU
who are an arm of the UN? They are *exactly* the people who should be
doing this stuff.

-- 
Today is Boomtime, the 25th day of The Aftermath in the YOLD 3180
"I do not want people to be agreeable, as it saves me that trouble of
                       liking them." – Jane Austen

Thread

POTUS backs net neutrality Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-11-10 23:31 +0000
  Re: POTUS backs net neutrality RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-11-11 08:05 +0000
    Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-11-11 09:10 +0000
      Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-11-11 14:08 +0000
        Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-11 19:20 +0000
          Re: POTUS backs net neutrality RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-11-12 14:46 +0000
            Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-12 17:26 +0200
              Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-12 19:07 +0000
                Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-12 22:12 +0200
                Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-12 21:09 +0000
                Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-13 00:27 +0200
                Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-11-13 11:26 +0000
                Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-13 14:44 +0000
                Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-13 17:02 +0200
                Re: POTUS backs net neutrality RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-11-14 16:18 +0000
    Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-13 16:21 -0800

csiph-web