Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: POTUS backs net neutrality |
| Date | 2014-11-11 19:20 +0000 |
| Organization | SDF Public Access UNIX System, Est. 1987 |
| Message-ID | <slrnm64obo.mlc.anthonyg@ma.sdf.org> (permalink) |
| References | <m3rhtf$bb0$1@speranza.aioe.org> <ccdub2FjdsrU1@mid.individual.net> <m3sjq3$b1u$1@speranza.aioe.org> <m3t58b$b3n$1@dont-email.me> |
On Tue, 11 Nov 2014 14:08:11 +0000 (UTC), Rich <rich@example.invalid> wrote: > Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> wrote: > As much as I dislike O. as a prez., there is one good thing with this. > He has "informed" a significant number of voters of an issue that > otherwise they would never have known about. > > And as was seen by the sopa/copa attempt, if enough voters push their > purchased congress moles, the moles will listen. Because all the > lobbying by corporate interests in the world does not count if your > voting base decides to turn you out of office. The president also has direct influence over the chair of the FCC, who in turn can influence policy on an administrative level. Not as good as having acutal legislation, but at least it's a move in the right direction.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
POTUS backs net neutrality Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-11-10 23:31 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-11-11 08:05 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Hils <hils@saynotospam.net> - 2014-11-11 09:10 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-11-11 14:08 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-11 19:20 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-11-12 14:46 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-12 17:26 +0200
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-12 19:07 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-12 22:12 +0200
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-12 21:09 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-13 00:27 +0200
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2014-11-13 11:26 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Anthony Giacalone <anthonyg@invalid.sdf.nospam.org> - 2014-11-13 14:44 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Marko Rauhamaa <marko@pacujo.net> - 2014-11-13 17:02 +0200
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-11-14 16:18 +0000
Re: POTUS backs net neutrality Oregonian Haruspex <bob_davis_retired@yahoo.com> - 2014-11-13 16:21 -0800
csiph-web