Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!aioe.org!.POSTED.0waBM8EsiO6GSUmEKysa8Q.user.gioia.aioe.org!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Dmitry Alexandrov <321942@gmail.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: email threading |
| Date | Thu, 11 Apr 2019 04:12:06 +0300 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Lines | 46 |
| Message-ID | <87k1g1e461.fsf@gmail.com> (permalink) |
| References | <20190328113109.20e2a9ce.rsw@therandymon.com> <nt80nf-st4.ln1@rasp.therandymon.com> <874l7mgq5k.fsf@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> <q7m21r$re7$2@dont-email.me> <q7te7b$ni1$2@dont-email.me> <q7udtp$cq6$2@dont-email.me> <u5ddnf-0v5.ln1@rasp.therandymon.com> <q82g7q$9cj$2@dont-email.me> <87o95nuli0.fsf_-_@violet.siamics.net> |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 0waBM8EsiO6GSUmEKysa8Q.user.gioia.aioe.org |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | multipart/signed; boundary="=-=-="; micalg=pgp-sha256; protocol="application/pgp-signature" |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@aioe.org |
| User-Agent | Gnus/5.13 (Gnus v5.13) Emacs/27.0.50 (gnu/linux) |
| Mail-Copies-To | always |
| Accept-Language | ru,en |
| X-Notice | Filtered by postfilter v. 0.9.2 |
| Accept | text/plain,text/markdown,text/x-org,text/html,text/*,*/* |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:e6ukwKqWIzsoP7H5cH5m+gL5v0E= |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:17798 |
Show key headers only | View raw
[Multipart message — attachments visible in raw view] - view raw
Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> wrote: > Email uses In-Reply-To: header in place of Usenet's References:, albeit that only holds the Message-ID: of the "parent" article. Good mail-useragents actually maintain ‘References’ header along with ‘In-Reply-To’. > References: typically provides a short(ish) history of ancestors for a given message, but I don't think I've ever seen a newsreader that'd make use of anything but the last entry in the list. Haven’t ever seen such a newsreader _besides_ Gnus, you mean? > No parsing of human-readable Subject: prefixes is (thankfully) necessary for email threading. Not normally necessary, yet sometimes is also useful (and Gnus is capable of doing that too). > (So long as the MUAs in question aren't broken in that regard, that is.) MUA is not the only thing that might be broken. Presumably, Mailman 2 is the most prominent example: it mangles message ids when gatewaying mail to NNTP: look at the hell that is going on at mozilla.* groups: half on the people is subscribed by mail, another half — by NNTP, so forget about proper threading.
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
email and time to think RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-28 11:31 -0400
Re: email and time to think Huge <Huge@nowhere.much.invalid> - 2019-03-28 15:33 +0000
Re: email and time to think Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2019-03-28 20:26 +0000
Re: email and time to think RS Wood <rswood@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-28 21:27 -0400
Re: email and time to think Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-03-29 03:17 -0300
Re: email and time to think Dan Purgert <dan@djph.net> - 2019-03-29 10:05 +0000
Re: email and time to think Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-03-29 16:46 -0300
Re: email and time to think RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-03-29 21:49 -0400
Re: email and time to think Mike Spencer <mds@bogus.nodomain.nowhere> - 2019-03-31 17:27 -0300
Re: email and time to think Jerry Peters <jerry@example.invalid> - 2019-03-29 20:20 +0000
Re: email and time to think Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-03-29 21:17 +0000
Re: email and time to think scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2019-04-01 16:28 +0000
Re: email and time to think Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-02 01:29 +0000
Re: email and time to think RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-04-02 21:00 -0400
Re: email and time to think Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-04-03 14:33 +0000
email threading Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2019-04-03 16:00 +0000
Re: email threading Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-04-03 16:59 +0000
Re: email threading scott@alfter.diespammersdie.us (Scott Alfter) - 2019-04-05 16:26 +0000
Re: email threading RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2019-04-05 21:55 -0400
Re: email threading Ivan Shmakov <ivan@siamics.net> - 2019-04-07 05:15 +0000
Re: email threading Eli the Bearded <*@eli.users.panix.com> - 2019-04-08 01:30 +0000
Re: email threading Pabst Blue Ribbon <pabst@blue.ribbon> - 2019-04-10 14:18 +0000
Re: email threading Dmitry Alexandrov <321942@gmail.com> - 2019-04-11 04:12 +0300
Re: email and time to think Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2019-03-29 21:11 +0000
Re: email and time to think Richard Kettlewell <invalid@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-31 15:32 +0100
Re: email and time to think Oregonian Haruspex <no_email@invalid.invalid> - 2019-03-29 06:36 +0000
Re: email and time to think visiblink <visiblink@mail.invalid> - 2019-03-29 19:56 -0700
Re: email and time to think Dostoevsky <dosdoevsky@protonmail.com> - 2019-03-29 23:35 -0500
csiph-web