Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| Path | csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!ecngs!feeder2.ecngs.de!46.4.82.166.MISMATCH!weretis.net!feeder1.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted |
| Date | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 12:17:11 -0500 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Lines | 16 |
| Message-ID | <6883#39652@usenet.squte.com> (permalink) |
| References | <q5b4pVsNgn532I1mKQ4ETpFy@dont-email.me> <c8af7kFdjuuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed |
| X-Trace | solani.org 1411406231 29904 eJwFwQERADEIAzBLMFp45Gxw9S/hE0Z6TiGZoCi8grbGJm4brF7HSexl2bOUesb7jJzfcvkDGKgRAg== (22 Sep 2014 17:17:11 GMT) |
| X-Complaints-To | abuse@news.solani.org |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | Mon, 22 Sep 2014 17:17:11 +0000 (UTC) |
| User-Agent | squte.com |
| X-User-ID | eJwNxMEBwCAIA8CVRAyVcSAp+4/Q3uPgYcHnBOJgMOUsre0m3v/VbBAie1nhvqk9Sh9LhpD2AS7VEas= |
| In-Reply-To | <c8af7kFdjuuU1@mid.individual.net> |
| X-Newsreader | http://squte.com |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:iZTOgTCyu48WuwhrF4hqw+0yIVI= |
| X-NNTP-Posting-Host | eJwFwYEBwCAIA7CXEGzBc4TZ/09YguDi5Ca4IUgWCQ8zfOMFH/qtvEVVNDgPeV4vbbUf1foBBlcQrw== |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.misc:5037 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Peter Mc Donough wrote: >Is this news still relevant You're right, and it got a lot of press at the time. They are still selling [1] the chip concerned though and advertising it as "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) 128 bits de/encryption." [1] http://www.innmax.com/en/im7206.html -- tdk Take back your Internet! http://squte.com/Webertarian-Manifesto View this thread at http://squte.com/usenet/enclosed-not-encrypted?src=u#comment-39652
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Enclosed, but not encrypted Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-22 01:58 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-09-22 05:17 -0500
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-22 12:29 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-22 16:23 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2014-09-22 13:24 +0200
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-09-22 12:17 -0500
csiph-web