Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted |
| Date | 2014-09-22 12:17 -0500 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <6883#39652@usenet.squte.com> (permalink) |
| References | <q5b4pVsNgn532I1mKQ4ETpFy@dont-email.me> <c8af7kFdjuuU1@mid.individual.net> |
Peter Mc Donough wrote: >Is this news still relevant You're right, and it got a lot of press at the time. They are still selling [1] the chip concerned though and advertising it as "Advanced Encryption Standard (AES) 128 bits de/encryption." [1] http://www.innmax.com/en/im7206.html -- tdk Take back your Internet! http://squte.com/Webertarian-Manifesto View this thread at http://squte.com/usenet/enclosed-not-encrypted?src=u#comment-39652
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Enclosed, but not encrypted Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-22 01:58 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-09-22 05:17 -0500
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-22 12:29 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-22 16:23 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2014-09-22 13:24 +0200
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-09-22 12:17 -0500
csiph-web