Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
| From | Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.misc |
| Subject | Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted |
| Date | 2014-09-22 13:24 +0200 |
| Message-ID | <c8af7kFdjuuU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <q5b4pVsNgn532I1mKQ4ETpFy@dont-email.me> |
Am 22.09.2014 um 03:58 schrieb Rich: > http://www.h-online.com/security/features/Enclosed-but-not-encrypted-746199.html > > A new generation of inexpensive disk drive enclosures using hardware ... Is this news still relevant. It is dated 18 February 2008, 16:09 cu Peter
Back to comp.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Enclosed, but not encrypted Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-22 01:58 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-09-22 05:17 -0500
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted RS Wood <rsw@therandymon.com> - 2014-09-22 12:29 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted Rich <rich@example.invalid> - 2014-09-22 16:23 +0000
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted Peter Mc Donough <mcd-mail-lists@gmx.net> - 2014-09-22 13:24 +0200
Re: Enclosed, but not encrypted "tdk" <forum.tdk@squte.com> - 2014-09-22 12:17 -0500
csiph-web