Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.python > #81961 > unrolled thread

Re: ORM opinion

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.

Contents

  Re: ORM opinion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 10:47 +1100

#81961 — Re: ORM opinion

On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:43 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<jcasale@activenetwerx.com> wrote:
> I found that article before posting and some of the guys here have already
> started using peewee. I don't have much time with it yet. So far all I can say
> is its unfortunate some package authors take such an approach to naming.
>
> I can't fathom sitting across the table from a CTO and CFO who are authorizing
> a 7 figure expenditure and then telling them about my peewee app with its
> playhouse module? Sigh...

Then never EVER get into Ruby. That seems to be the norm for gem naming.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python

csiph-web