Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.python > #81959 > unrolled thread
| Started by | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| First post | 2014-12-05 10:38 +1100 |
| Last post | 2014-12-05 10:38 +1100 |
| Articles | 1 — 1 participant |
Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python
This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by
below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.
Re: ORM opinion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 10:38 +1100
| From | Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Date | 2014-12-05 10:38 +1100 |
| Subject | Re: ORM opinion |
| Message-ID | <mailman.16596.1417736298.18130.python-list@python.org> |
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Joseph L. Casale <jcasale@activenetwerx.com> wrote: > I am stuck with the current architecture, but the idea you propose has > been thrown around, truth is I am not certain if we are enduring the > effort of such a large rewrite that Python is the tool to use (this is a > Windows application) but regardless your idea is one that is proposed. Windows? Then even more important to minimize the number of processes you create. They're very costly on Windows. ChrisA
Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python
csiph-web