Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.python > #81959 > unrolled thread

Re: ORM opinion

Started byChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
First post2014-12-05 10:38 +1100
Last post2014-12-05 10:38 +1100
Articles 1 — 1 participant

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.python

This discussion starts older than the indexed window; earlier articles aren't shown. The article labeled Started by below is the oldest one visible, not the original post.


Contents

  Re: ORM opinion Chris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com> - 2014-12-05 10:38 +1100

#81959 — Re: ORM opinion

FromChris Angelico <rosuav@gmail.com>
Date2014-12-05 10:38 +1100
SubjectRe: ORM opinion
Message-ID<mailman.16596.1417736298.18130.python-list@python.org>
On Fri, Dec 5, 2014 at 10:20 AM, Joseph L. Casale
<jcasale@activenetwerx.com> wrote:
> I am stuck with the current architecture, but the idea you propose has
> been thrown around, truth is I am not certain if we are enduring the
> effort of such a large rewrite that Python is the tool to use (this is a
> Windows application) but regardless your idea is one that is proposed.

Windows? Then even more important to minimize the number of processes
you create. They're very costly on Windows.

ChrisA

[toc] | [standalone]


Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.python


csiph-web