Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.prolog > #14643

But I shouldn't waste too much time (Was: How long willl I piss on Bart Demoen)

From Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.prolog
Subject But I shouldn't waste too much time (Was: How long willl I piss on Bart Demoen)
Date 2025-07-10 19:13 +0200
Message-ID <104osb6$227ta$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References (4 earlier) <104oarl$20j1d$1@solani.org> <104occh$20jqg$1@solani.org> <104ooqo$20stc$1@solani.org> <104oq1c$20toh$1@solani.org> <104oqco$20u1b$1@solani.org>

Show all headers | View raw


Hi,

But I shouldn't waste too much time.
One shouldn't punish people for just
being plain stupid.

Like for example this clueless french
philosopher who had a lot of troubles
with non-classical logic.

His brain tried to eliminate non-classical
logic, it was keen on avoiding non-classical
logic. A typical species of a human with

an extremly small brain, again working
in the wrong place!

Bye

P.S.: Maybe this a Poincaré thingy? Poincaré
was a strong critic of logicism (as championed
by Frege and Russell) and of Hilbert’s
formalist program.

But, he did not formally use or promote systems
like intuitionistic logic, modal logic, or
relevance logic. His logical framework remained
within the bounds of classical logic,

though he was skeptical of excessive formalism.
He thought formal systems could miss the creative
and synthetic nature of mathematical
invention.

Mild Shock schrieb:
> Hi,
> 
> How long willl I piss on Bart Demoen?
> I don't know, as long as it takes to
> clean up my cabinet full of ghosts.
> 
> After that I might do some LogNonsenseTalk
> bashing again, didn't do a for a long time.
> But since Paulo Moura was deciple of
> 
> following Bart Demoen in mobbing, he
> deserves nothing better. But LogNonsenseTalk
> is not yet a ghost, not retired yet,
> 
> still a walking Zombie...
> 
> LoL
> 
> Bye
> 
> Mild Shock schrieb:
>> Hi,
>>
>> But after all these years, Wikipedia still mentions:
>>
>> Choice Point Elimination
>> https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Comparison_of_Prolog_implementations#Optimizations 
>>
>> Still the complete moron Bart Demoen, drowning in
>> Dunning-Kruger syndrom, of incompetent people working
>> in the wrong domain, accused me of:
>>
>>  > gives me the feeling that "choice point elimination" is
>>  > something jb coined, and does not belong to traditional
>>  > Prolog implementation terminology.
>>
>> So what does Choice Point Elimination mean?
>>
>>  From compiler optimization I would guess elimination
>> and avoidance have the similar meaning, whereas I would
>> prefer elimination. Elimination could mean to eliminate
>>
>> an intermediate step. Like in quantifier elimination,
>> you eliminate something that was already there but you
>> could somehow get rid of it through some transformation,
>>
>> you don't really avoid it. So the Physics PhDs Bart Demoen
>> which had no education in mathematical logic is no
>> way excused. He was just exposing the dark side of
>>
>> wrong people in wrong places.
>>
>> Bye

Back to comp.lang.prolog | Previous | NextPrevious in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

The Ghosts in my Cabinet: Indexing Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 12:45 +0200
  Observed while watching FAIL/REDO ports (Was: The Ghosts in my Cabinet: Indexing) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 12:46 +0200
    Shocking Revelation: No eGovernment can trust Prolog! (Was: Observed while watching FAIL/REDO ports) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 13:26 +0200
      Easier certification with 100% Prolog Prolog? (Was: Shocking Revelation: No eGovernment can trust Prolog!) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 14:05 +0200
        Doing a Prolog system without any iterator API (Was: Easier certification with 100% Prolog Prolog?) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 14:14 +0200
          The headache with JIT indexing: Native -> Prolog (Was: Doing a Prolog system without any iterator API) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 14:40 +0200
            Just lets burn another candle for Barty Boy (Was: The headache with JIT indexing: Native -> Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 18:13 +0200
              Physics PhDs might never have heard of Quantifier Eliminations (Re: Just lets burn another candle for Barty Boy) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 18:33 +0200
                How long willl I piss on Bart Demoen (Was: Physics PhDs might never have heard of Quantifier Eliminations) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 18:39 +0200
                But I shouldn't waste too much time (Was: How long willl I piss on Bart Demoen) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-10 19:13 +0200
  DCG is easily affected (Was: The Ghosts in my Cabinet: Indexing) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-11 09:38 +0200
    The headache an eGovernment might get from Prolog (Was: DCG is easily affected) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 15:20 +0200
      Wait till they find out about compare/3 (Was: The headache an eGovernment might get from Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 15:24 +0200
        Corr. (Was: Wait till they find out about compare/3) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 15:28 +0200
          eGovernements will need AGI to survive (Was: Corr. (Was: Wait till they find out about compare/3)) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 18:41 +0200
            Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign (Re: eGovernements will need AGI to survive) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 18:41 +0200
              The Signal Collapse gives us System Uncertainty (Re: Having 2544 issues is probably a bad sign) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 19:02 +0200
                Rename GitHub, to TurdPit, and make Amber Heard their CEO (Was: The Signal Collapse gives us System Uncertainty) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-15 19:52 +0200
            Humans are just overwhelmed by computers (Was: eGovernements will need AGI to survive) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-16 18:59 +0200
              Fishy 🐟 in Scryer Prolog and SWI-Prolog (Was: Humans are just overwhelmed by computers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-16 20:08 +0200
                So we are essentially all using Trojan Horses 🐎 daily? (Re: Fishy 🐟 in Scryer Prolog and SWI-Prolog) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-17 10:57 +0200
                Strudel Rust gives Scryer Frust 💩: Try C+20 Pipes (Was: Fishy 🐟 in Scryer Prolog and SWI-Prolog( Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-11-25 22:55 +0100
              SWI-Prolog as a Test Bed for Copilots (Was: Humans are just overwhelmed by computers) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-20 14:36 +0200
                Mathematics currently hates Computer Science because of AI (Re: SWI-Prolog as a Test Bed for Copilots) Mild Shock <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2025-07-20 15:13 +0200

csiph-web