Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.php > #12130 > unrolled thread

well it works!

Started byrichard <noreply@example.com>
First post2013-12-04 10:57 -0500
Last post2013-12-09 23:15 -0500
Articles 20 on this page of 42 — 14 participants

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php


Contents

  well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 10:57 -0500
    Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 18:55 +0000
      Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 15:02 -0500
        Re: well it works! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-04 21:10 +0000
          Re: well it works! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-12-04 23:56 -0500
            Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 08:27 +0100
              Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 10:21 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 12:08 +0000
                  Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 12:51 +0000
                Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 14:35 +0100
                Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:15 +0000
                  Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 15:15 +0000
                  Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 17:15 +0000
                    Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 19:11 +0000
              Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:08 +0000
        Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 22:03 +0000
          Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-05 16:42 -0500
            Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 23:20 +0000
        Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:20 -0800
          Re: well it works! "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-12-04 20:24 -0600
            Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 21:50 -0800
    Re: well it works! Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 21:21 +0000
      Re: well it works! Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-12-04 15:37 -0800
      Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:19 -0800
    no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 12:21 +0100
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 14:05 +0000
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 16:12 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Dennis <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-12-07 10:27 -0500
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-07 08:24 -0800
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 17:31 +0100
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-07 17:35 +0000
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 12:33 -0500
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-08 19:20 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 20:14 +0000
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 19:59 -0500
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 21:17 -0500
                  Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 03:13 +0000
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 06:31 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-09 14:12 -0500
                  Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 23:15 -0500

Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →


#12168

FromEvan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid>
Date2013-12-06 21:50 -0800
Message-ID<jmd5a9h74amimomdq3bv1f56kp17rhmos6@4ax.com>
In reply to#12144
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 20:24:22 -0600, "Peter H. Coffin"
<hellsop@ninehells.com> wrote:

>Oh come on... After all the work we've put in on this....

I've heard richard's html page is 30 MB. Oh, only 500kb or so is the
actual code. The other 29+ MB is a list of all the people from
different newsgroups who helped him write the code.

I'm obviously kidding. It's obvious bullis would never openly
acknowledge help from others.
-- 
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12139

FromDenis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com>
Date2013-12-04 21:21 +0000
Message-ID<l7o6c9$u3m$4@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12130
On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:57:13 -0500, richard wrote:

> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html

Good, I'm glad it works, now you never need to bother us with stupid 
questions again.

-- 
Denis McMahon, denismfmcmahon@gmail.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12141

FromScott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com>
Date2013-12-04 15:37 -0800
Message-ID<l7oebi$rvq$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12139
On 12/4/2013 1:21 PM, Denis McMahon wrote:
> On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 10:57:13 -0500, richard wrote:
>
>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>
> Good, I'm glad it works, now you never need to bother us with stupid
> questions again.
>

Please don't scare him away, I have taken it in as some form of 
entertainment.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12142

FromEvan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid>
Date2013-12-04 17:19 -0800
Message-ID<05lv99p80hs518v2no7f7p9p39025m3ehu@4ax.com>
In reply to#12139
On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 21:21:13 +0000 (UTC), Denis McMahon
<denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> wrote:

>Good, I'm glad it works, now you never need to bother us with stupid 
>questions again.

Oh, he'll be back. In less than 72 hours.
-- 
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12171 — no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromLuuk <luuk@invalid.lan>
Date2013-12-07 12:21 +0100
Subjectno it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<2vcbna-40e.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>
In reply to#12130
On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>

no, it does not

the site says: "Select year or letter"

But the "or letter" part does not work.....

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12172 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromDenis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com>
Date2013-12-07 14:05 +0000
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<l7v9vk$hu3$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12171
On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:

> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html

> no, it does not
> the site says: "Select year or letter"
> But the "or letter" part does not work.....

So that's another 15 years of development at least?

-- 
Denis McMahon, denismfmcmahon@gmail.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12173 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromLuuk <luuk@invalid.lan>
Date2013-12-07 16:12 +0100
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<jgqbna-5gm.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>
In reply to#12172
On 07-12-2013 15:05, Denis McMahon wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:
>
>> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>
>> no, it does not
>> the site says: "Select year or letter"
>> But the "or letter" part does not work.....
>
> So that's another 15 years of development at least?
>

He was asking in another thread when to use 'include'

So it's possible that he wanted to exclude the part of code that is 
responsible for this 'A'-'Z', that is currently not working.

When development of this 'A'-'Z' part is finished (15 years?), he will 
only have to uncomment the include statement......

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12174 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromDennis <nobody@nowhere.invalid>
Date2013-12-07 10:27 -0500
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<5jf6a99scediehkuda7fo2lf8m30s7ki1i@4ax.com>
In reply to#12173
On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:12:57 +0100, Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> opined:

>When development of this 'A'-'Z' part is finished (15 years?), he will 
>only have to uncomment the include statement......

Or spell "include" correctly...

-- 

Dennis

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12175 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromEvan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid>
Date2013-12-07 08:24 -0800
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<ksi6a95m9ft9eaulb96pin6d2dceofhphg@4ax.com>
In reply to#12173
On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:12:57 +0100, Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> wrote:

>He was asking in another thread when to use 'include'

No, he was asking when to use inlcude .

Big difference :)
-- 
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12176 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromLuuk <luuk@invalid.lan>
Date2013-12-07 17:31 +0100
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<g4vbna-j3s.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>
In reply to#12175
On 07-12-2013 17:24, Evan Platt wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:12:57 +0100, Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> wrote:
>
>> He was asking in another thread when to use 'include'
>
> No, he was asking when to use inlcude .
>
> Big difference :)
>

i'm makeing too many typos meself...
so i dont _want_ to see the difference ;)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12177 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromThe Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid>
Date2013-12-07 17:35 +0000
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<l7vm8e$for$1@news.albasani.net>
In reply to#12175
On 07/12/13 16:24, Evan Platt wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 16:12:57 +0100, Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> wrote:
>
>> He was asking in another thread when to use 'include'
>
> No, he was asking when to use inlcude .
>
> Big difference :)
>
...especially to a PHP interpreter.


-- 
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to 
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the 
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are 
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a 
diminishing number of producers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12190 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

Fromrichard <noreply@example.com>
Date2013-12-08 12:33 -0500
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<1krlxaupd3tvi$.9yaivc5havv5$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#12171
On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:

> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>
> 
> no, it does not
> 
> the site says: "Select year or letter"
> 
> But the "or letter" part does not work.....

Because there are no links on the letters.
Does the location "test" mean anything?
I was speaking of the functional part of including a page within an iframe.

See my "new" homepage and you'll get a different look at what I am working
on now.

www.mroldies.net
All links work, but with some, you will see no changes.
And you will kindly note, I ditched the iframe.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12193 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromLuuk <luuk@invalid.lan>
Date2013-12-08 19:20 +0100
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<sspena-pgt.ln1@luuk.invalid.lan>
In reply to#12190
On 08-12-2013 18:33, richard wrote:
> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:
>
>> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>>
>>
>> no, it does not
>>
>> the site says: "Select year or letter"
>>
>> But the "or letter" part does not work.....
>
> Because there are no links on the letters.
> Does the location "test" mean anything?
> I was speaking of the functional part of including a page within an iframe.
>
> See my "new" homepage and you'll get a different look at what I am working
> on now.
>
> www.mroldies.net
> All links work, but with some, you will see no changes.

What is the use of link, when no changes happen?

/me is a little bit confused.....

> And you will kindly note, I ditched the iframe.
>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12198 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromDenis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com>
Date2013-12-08 20:14 +0000
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<l82jv4$1ti$2@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12193
On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 19:20:45 +0100, Luuk wrote:

> On 08-12-2013 18:33, richard wrote:

>> www.mroldies.net All links work, but with some, you will see no
>> changes.

> What is the use of link, when no changes happen?

Deja fu?

-- 
Denis McMahon, denismfmcmahon@gmail.com

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12201 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromNorman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com>
Date2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<l82ugr$bf6$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12193
On 12/08/2013 01:20 PM, Luuk wrote:
> On 08-12-2013 18:33, richard wrote:
>> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:
>>
>>> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>>>
>>>
>>> no, it does not
>>>
>>> the site says: "Select year or letter"
>>>
>>> But the "or letter" part does not work.....
>>
>> Because there are no links on the letters.
>> Does the location "test" mean anything?
>> I was speaking of the functional part of including a page within an
>> iframe.
>>
>> See my "new" homepage and you'll get a different look at what I am
>> working
>> on now.
>>
>> www.mroldies.net
>> All links work, but with some, you will see no changes.
>
> What is the use of link, when no changes happen?
>
> /me is a little bit confused.....
>
>> And you will kindly note, I ditched the iframe.
>>
>
>

Nothing on that page is working... the URL never changes.

-- 
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062
-Have you been to www.php.net yet?-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12203 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

Fromrichard <noreply@example.com>
Date2013-12-08 19:59 -0500
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<ridzval58c8v.fuic8kapinox$.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#12201
On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:14:35 -0500, Norman Peelman wrote:

> On 12/08/2013 01:20 PM, Luuk wrote:
>> On 08-12-2013 18:33, richard wrote:
>>> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:
>>>
>>>> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>>>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> no, it does not
>>>>
>>>> the site says: "Select year or letter"
>>>>
>>>> But the "or letter" part does not work.....
>>>
>>> Because there are no links on the letters.
>>> Does the location "test" mean anything?
>>> I was speaking of the functional part of including a page within an
>>> iframe.
>>>
>>> See my "new" homepage and you'll get a different look at what I am
>>> working
>>> on now.
>>>
>>> www.mroldies.net
>>> All links work, but with some, you will see no changes.
>>
>> What is the use of link, when no changes happen?
>>
>> /me is a little bit confused.....
>>
>>> And you will kindly note, I ditched the iframe.
>>>
>>
>>
> 
> Nothing on that page is working... the URL never changes.

Bullshit liar you are.
Who says the URL has to change?
I could have tons of stuff all on one page.
With a little javascrpt, you see it when you click on a link.
I use php include to change what you see.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12204 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

From"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid>
Date2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<l83874$nd7$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12203
richard the r00de wrote:

> Bullshit liar you are.

R00de!!!

> Who says the URL has to change?

We all do. Else how is it (the link) supposed to do anything?

> I could have tons of stuff all on one page.

You already do, none of which is worthwhile.

> With a little javascrpt, you see it when you click on a link.

No, we don't.

> I use php include to change what you see.

You don't know enough about PHP to make that a true statement. All you 
know is copying scripts of others and putting them on ugly pages.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12205 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

Fromrichard <noreply@example.com>
Date2013-12-08 21:17 -0500
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<1j1yg3j372vhk.1o7ffjysxgzxj.dlg@40tude.net>
In reply to#12204
On Mon, 9 Dec 2013 02:00:05 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

> richard the r00de wrote:
> 
>> Bullshit liar you are.
> 
> R00de!!!

YOu should know, you are the definition of rude.

> 
>> Who says the URL has to change?
> 
> We all do. Else how is it (the link) supposed to do anything?
> 
>> I could have tons of stuff all on one page.
> 
> You already do, none of which is worthwhile.
> 
>> With a little javascrpt, you see it when you click on a link.
> 
> No, we don't.
> 
>> I use php include to change what you see.
> 
> You don't know enough about PHP to make that a true statement. All you 
> know is copying scripts of others and putting them on ugly pages.

So where's your shiddy widdle website at bunky?

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12206 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

From"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid>
Date2013-12-09 03:13 +0000
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<l83cfr$c8j$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12205
richard the sto0pid wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> richard the r00de wrote:
>>> Bullshit liar you are.
>> 
>> R00de!!!
> 
> YOu should know, you are the definition of rude.

YOu are the one who insults people giving you advice.

>>> <snip>
> 
> So where's your shiddy widdle website at bunky?

It's on the WWW, where all websites live.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


#12207 — Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!]

FromNorman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com>
Date2013-12-09 06:31 -0500
SubjectRe: no it does not [Re: well it works!]
Message-ID<l849lt$fkn$1@dont-email.me>
In reply to#12203
On 12/08/2013 07:59 PM, richard wrote:
> On Sun, 08 Dec 2013 18:14:35 -0500, Norman Peelman wrote:
>
>> On 12/08/2013 01:20 PM, Luuk wrote:
>>> On 08-12-2013 18:33, richard wrote:
>>>> On Sat, 07 Dec 2013 12:21:44 +0100, Luuk wrote:
>>>>
>>>>> On 04-12-2013 16:57, richard wrote:
>>>>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>>>>>
>>>>>
>>>>> no, it does not
>>>>>
>>>>> the site says: "Select year or letter"
>>>>>
>>>>> But the "or letter" part does not work.....
>>>>
>>>> Because there are no links on the letters.
>>>> Does the location "test" mean anything?
>>>> I was speaking of the functional part of including a page within an
>>>> iframe.
>>>>
>>>> See my "new" homepage and you'll get a different look at what I am
>>>> working
>>>> on now.
>>>>
>>>> www.mroldies.net
>>>> All links work, but with some, you will see no changes.
>>>
>>> What is the use of link, when no changes happen?
>>>
>>> /me is a little bit confused.....
>>>
>>>> And you will kindly note, I ditched the iframe.
>>>>
>>>
>>>
>>
>> Nothing on that page is working... the URL never changes.
>
> Bullshit liar you are.

   And I'm telling you I visited your page and not one link did 
anything. Except for the header and link/menu system, nothing else happened.

> Who says the URL has to change?
> I could have tons of stuff all on one page.
> With a little javascrpt, you see it when you click on a link.
> I use php include to change what you see.

   And I'm telling you I visited your page and not one link did 
anything. Except for the header and link/menu system, nothing else happened.


-- 
Norman
Registered Linux user #461062
-Have you been to www.php.net yet?-

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]


Page 2 of 3 — ← Prev page 1 [2] 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php


csiph-web