Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.php > #12130 > unrolled thread

well it works!

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.php

Contents

  well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 10:57 -0500
    Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 18:55 +0000
      Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-04 15:02 -0500
        Re: well it works! Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2013-12-04 21:10 +0000
          Re: well it works! Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2013-12-04 23:56 -0500
            Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 08:27 +0100
              Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 10:21 +0000
                Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 12:08 +0000
                  Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 12:51 +0000
                Re: well it works! Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> - 2013-12-05 14:35 +0100
                Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:15 +0000
                  Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 15:15 +0000
                  Re: well it works! Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2013-12-05 17:15 +0000
                    Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 19:11 +0000
              Re: well it works! The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-05 14:08 +0000
        Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-04 22:03 +0000
          Re: well it works! richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-05 16:42 -0500
            Re: well it works! "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-05 23:20 +0000
        Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:20 -0800
          Re: well it works! "Peter H. Coffin" <hellsop@ninehells.com> - 2013-12-04 20:24 -0600
            Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-06 21:50 -0800
    Re: well it works! Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-04 21:21 +0000
      Re: well it works! Scott Johnson <noonehome@chalupasworld.com> - 2013-12-04 15:37 -0800
      Re: well it works! Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-04 17:19 -0800
    no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 12:21 +0100
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-07 14:05 +0000
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 16:12 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Dennis <nobody@nowhere.invalid> - 2013-12-07 10:27 -0500
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Evan Platt <evan@theobvious.espphotography.com.invalid> - 2013-12-07 08:24 -0800
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-07 17:31 +0100
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> - 2013-12-07 17:35 +0000
      Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 12:33 -0500
        Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2013-12-08 19:20 +0100
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2013-12-08 20:14 +0000
          Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-08 18:14 -0500
            Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 19:59 -0500
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 02:00 +0000
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-08 21:17 -0500
                  Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] "Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> - 2013-12-09 03:13 +0000
              Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 06:31 -0500
                Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] richard <noreply@example.com> - 2013-12-09 14:12 -0500
                  Re: no it does not [Re: well it works!] Norman Peelman <npeelman@cfl.rr.com> - 2013-12-09 23:15 -0500

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

#12130 — well it works!

http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#12132

richard the sto0pid wrote:

> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html

..for some degree of "works"... (and a very small one, at that)

First, it is ugly as sin. You have absolutely no sense of design or good 
coding practices and never will.

Second, things that appear as if they should be "clickable" are not. I 
clicked on "K" and nothing happened. I clicked on "1961" (or any other 
year) and the right pane still says "A Summer Place."

Third, the <title> says "ab" - what's that suppose to mean?

You should find a new hobby.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12133

On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

> richard the sto0pid wrote:
> 
>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
> 
> ..for some degree of "works"... (and a very small one, at that)
> 
> First, it is ugly as sin. You have absolutely no sense of design or good 
> coding practices and never will.

Your pathetic opinion has been recycled.

> 
> Second, things that appear as if they should be "clickable" are not. I 
> clicked on "K" and nothing happened. I clicked on "1961" (or any other 
> year) and the right pane still says "A Summer Place."
> 

True it does for now.
But clik on any link in the left panel and you will see that change.


> Third, the <title> says "ab" - what's that suppose to mean?
> 
> You should find a new hobby.

Says you.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12137

In article <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net>, richard
<noreply@example.com> wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

> > You should find a new hobby.
> 
> Says you.

I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.

-- 
Tim

"That excessive bail ought not to be required, nor excessive fines imposed,
nor cruel and unusual punishments inflicted"  --  Bill of Rights 1689

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12145

On 12/4/2013 4:10 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
> In article <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net>, richard
> <noreply@example.com> wrote:
>
>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>> > You should find a new hobby.
>>
>> Says you.
>
> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>

+1


-- 
==================
Remove the "x" from my email address
Jerry Stuckle
JDS Computer Training Corp.
jstucklex@attglobal.net
==================

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12146

Jerry Stuckle, 2013-12-05 05:56:

> On 12/4/2013 4:10 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
>> In article <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net>, richard
>> <noreply@example.com> wrote:
>>
>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>
>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>
>>> Says you.
>>
>> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>>
> 
> +1

+2


-- 
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12147

Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> writes:
> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-12-05 05:56:
>> On 12/4/2013 4:10 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
>>> In article <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net>, richard
>>> <noreply@example.com> wrote:
>>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>>
>>>> Says you.
>>>
>>> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>> 
>> +1
> +2

-1.  His hobby is mostly harmless and no one is obliged to answer a
question just because it's asked.  There's a whiff (only a whiff) of
bullying about the almost universal opprobrium with which I am slightly
uncomfortable.

He does post incorrect answers on occasion, but lots of people do that
(myself included) without being told to get a new hobby.

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12149

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> Arno Welzel writes:
>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>> Tim Streater wrote:
>>>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>>>
>>>>> Says you.
>>>>
>>>> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>>> 
>>> +1
>>
>> +2
> 
> -1.  His hobby is mostly harmless and no one is obliged to answer a
> question just because it's asked.  There's a whiff (only a whiff) of
> bullying about the almost universal opprobrium with which I am slightly
> uncomfortable.
> 
> He does post incorrect answers on occasion, but lots of people do that
> (myself included) without being told to get a new hobby.

You probably aren't as aware of RtS's history on Usenet as some of the 
rest of us - and not just history of his web site activities. This goes 
back a long way.

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12150

"Beauregard T. Shagnasty" <a.nony.mous@example.invalid> writes:

> Ben Bacarisse wrote:
>
>> Arno Welzel writes:
>>> Jerry Stuckle wrote:
>>>> Tim Streater wrote:
>>>>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>>>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> Says you.
>>>>>
>>>>> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>>>> 
>>>> +1
>>>
>>> +2
>> 
>> -1.  His hobby is mostly harmless and no one is obliged to answer a
>> question just because it's asked.  There's a whiff (only a whiff) of
>> bullying about the almost universal opprobrium with which I am slightly
>> uncomfortable.
>> 
>> He does post incorrect answers on occasion, but lots of people do that
>> (myself included) without being told to get a new hobby.
>
> You probably aren't as aware of RtS's history on Usenet as some of the 
> rest of us - and not just history of his web site activities. This goes 
> back a long way.

I think I am, but obviously I can't be sure that I know what you are
referring to.  But I am having a hard time imagining what history would
alter my current opinion.  I would not mind (indeed I'd join in with)
fierce criticism of bad behaviour like racist remarks, but I'd do that
at the time.  What is currently being criticised seems to me to be right
down the middle of internet annoyances: he's got an incorrect sense of
what he knows, he asks questions that he should have already learned the
answers to, and he can get angry and rude when that's pointed out.  All
these suggest that leaving him alone is a better strategy than baiting
him.

As an aside, I try to answer questions based on the value of the answer.
If I think I can add something, I do, even if the specific poster asking
the question is a troll or some otherwise annoying poster.  I say this
only to explain why I've answered someone I am suggesting might be best
ignored -- I mean best ignored unless the reply has it's own value.

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12152

Ben Bacarisse, 2013-12-05 11:21:

> Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> writes:
>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-12-05 05:56:
>>> On 12/4/2013 4:10 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
>>>> In article <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net>, richard
>>>> <noreply@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>>>
>>>>> Says you.
>>>>
>>>> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>>>
>>> +1
>> +2
> 
> -1.  His hobby is mostly harmless and no one is obliged to answer a
> question just because it's asked.  There's a whiff (only a whiff) of
> bullying about the almost universal opprobrium with which I am slightly
> uncomfortable.

His hobby may lead to a compromised server which is used to spread spam,
malware or phishing due to security holes in his scripts.



-- 
Arno Welzel
http://arnowelzel.de
http://de-rec-fahrrad.de

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12154

On 05/12/13 10:21, Ben Bacarisse wrote:
> Arno Welzel <usenet@arnowelzel.de> writes:
>> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-12-05 05:56:
>>> On 12/4/2013 4:10 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
>>>> In article <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net>, richard
>>>> <noreply@example.com> wrote:
>>>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>>
>>>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>>>
>>>>> Says you.
>>>>
>>>> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>>>
>>> +1
>> +2
>
> -1.  His hobby is mostly harmless and no one is obliged to answer a
> question just because it's asked.  There's a whiff (only a whiff) of
> bullying about the almost universal opprobrium with which I am slightly
> uncomfortable.
>

you must be new

its not the questions, it the length of time he has been asking the same 
terrfyngly newbie questions and ignoring all advice to the point of 
painting himself as fundamentally honestly genuinely retarded, or just 
an idle programmer who is trolling around irritating people becaus he 
had a bad day at the office by inventing a PFY personality.

> He does post incorrect answers on occasion, but lots of people do that
> (myself included) without being told to get a new hobby.
>

When someone spends ten years asking you who to tie their shoelaces, it 
is fair to say that its probably time they bought some boots.


-- 
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to 
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the 
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are 
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a 
diminishing number of producers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12155

The Natural Philosopher wrote:

> When someone spends ten years asking you [how] to tie their shoelaces, it
> is fair to say that its probably time they bought some boots.

With Velcro® straps!

(though I suspect RtS would even have trouble with those.)

= != ==        <-- shoelace

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12156

The Natural Philosopher <tnp@invalid.invalid> writes:
<snip>
> you must be new

No, I've been around for some time and I've seen his posts for some time
too, in this and other groups.

> its not the questions, it the length of time he has been asking the
> same terrfyngly newbie questions and ignoring all advice to the point
> of painting himself as fundamentally honestly genuinely retarded, or
> just an idle programmer who is trolling around irritating people
> becaus he had a bad day at the office by inventing a PFY personality.

Yes, that's annoying, but even the silliest questions can invite answers
that might be useful to others.  If not, or you prefer to consider only
the poster you are answering, you can just ignore them.

<snip>
> When someone spends ten years asking you who to tie their shoelaces,
> it is fair to say that its probably time they bought some boots.

Not if trying to tie knots is his hobby.  Lots of people have silly
hobbies at which they will never be much good.  What's bothered me (and
I want to stress that I am only a little bothered -- there's no great
crime here) is the vitriol that is directed at him by almost everyone.
I can't see the point of it.

-- 
Ben.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12157

Ben Bacarisse wrote:

> Not if trying to tie knots is his hobby.  Lots of people have silly
> hobbies at which they will never be much good.  What's bothered me (and
> I want to stress that I am only a little bothered -- there's no great
> crime here) is the vitriol that is directed at him by almost everyone. I
> can't see the point of it.

If you only know him from web authoring groups, I can understand your 
point of view. However, RtS has been posting to Usenet for, what, nearly 
two decades, and it is a rare case if you find a reply from him that is 
not rude in some way or another.

He frequents/ed trucking groups for quite awhile; kook groups; general 
interest groups; and more. He has claimed to collect child pornography; he 
disses cops all the time; he's clueless about copyright law; he gloated 
when his hardworking parents died and left him a seven-figure inheritance 
(info he published on his own web site in 2008); and he even won his very 
own award back in the last century.

Spend a few moments here, if you wish:
http://home.comcast.net/~unit24/cenkoc/index1.html

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12153

On 05/12/13 07:27, Arno Welzel wrote:
> Jerry Stuckle, 2013-12-05 05:56:
>
>> On 12/4/2013 4:10 PM, Tim Streater wrote:
>>> In article <e3o8cni6njbg.1qulo2ya5mslj$.dlg@40tude.net>, richard
>>> <noreply@example.com> wrote:
>>>
>>>> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>
>>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>>>
>>>> Says you.
>>>
>>> I think says every bugger on this newsgroup.
>>>
>>
>> +1
>
> +2
>
>
3++

-- 
Ineptocracy

(in-ep-toc’-ra-cy) – a system of government where the least capable to 
lead are elected by the least capable of producing, and where the 
members of society least likely to sustain themselves or succeed, are 
rewarded with goods and services paid for by the confiscated wealth of a 
diminishing number of producers.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12140

richard the sto0pid wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>> 
>> ..for some degree of "works"... (and a very small one, at that)
>> 
>> First, it is ugly as sin. You have absolutely no sense of design or
>> good coding practices and never will.
> 
> Your pathetic opinion has been recycled.

Recycled?  Oh I see what you mean. You mean I've chosen a description of 
your work that so many others have also stated in the past. Hell yes, that 
is because it is true.

>> Second, things that appear as if they should be "clickable" are not. I
>> clicked on "K" and nothing happened. I clicked on "1961" (or any other
>> year) and the right pane still says "A Summer Place."
> 
> True it does for now.

Oh yeah, I also clicked on "The Archies" and nothing happened.

> But clik on any link in the left panel and you will see that change.

Whoop-de-do. Still leaves me wondering why you even bother messing with 
this stuff. Nobody is ever going to visit your pathetic pages on any kind 
of regular basis. I'll bet your total traffic is from a few Usenet posters 
when you list a link in your own posts. Most of them have a desire to 
laugh at your oh-so-amateur code.

>> Third, the <title> says "ab" - what's that suppose to mean?
>> 
>> You should find a new hobby.
> 
> Says you.

Go right ahead and work ("work!" Ha!) on your silly pages, but stop 
bothering real people on Usenet with your silly questions.

Remember:  = != ==

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12158

On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 22:03:39 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:

> richard the sto0pid wrote:
> 
>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>> 
>>> ..for some degree of "works"... (and a very small one, at that)
>>> 
>>> First, it is ugly as sin. You have absolutely no sense of design or
>>> good coding practices and never will.
>> 
>> Your pathetic opinion has been recycled.
> 
> Recycled?  Oh I see what you mean. You mean I've chosen a description of 
> your work that so many others have also stated in the past. Hell yes, that 
> is because it is true.
> 
>>> Second, things that appear as if they should be "clickable" are not. I
>>> clicked on "K" and nothing happened. I clicked on "1961" (or any other
>>> year) and the right pane still says "A Summer Place."
>> 
>> True it does for now.
> 
> Oh yeah, I also clicked on "The Archies" and nothing happened.

That's because there is no link dumbass.
I have no links on artists names or images.


> 
>> But clik on any link in the left panel and you will see that change.
> 
> Whoop-de-do. Still leaves me wondering why you even bother messing with 
> this stuff. Nobody is ever going to visit your pathetic pages on any kind 
> of regular basis. I'll bet your total traffic is from a few Usenet posters 
> when you list a link in your own posts. Most of them have a desire to 
> laugh at your oh-so-amateur code.
> 

Really? They are visiting the site.
How long did it take youtube.com to get noticed?
Overnight? No site has ever been put online one day and the next in the
limelight.


>>> Third, the <title> says "ab" - what's that suppose to mean?
>>> 
>>> You should find a new hobby.
>> 
>> Says you.
> 
> Go right ahead and work ("work!" Ha!) on your silly pages, but stop 
> bothering real people on Usenet with your silly questions.
> 
> Remember:  = != ==

Remember BtS ===>> Beau the shithead.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12159

richard the sto0pid wrote:

> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>> Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>>>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>>>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>>>> 
>>>> ..for some degree of "works"... (and a very small one, at that)
>>>> 
>>>> First, it is ugly as sin. You have absolutely no sense of design or
>>>> good coding practices and never will.
>>> 
>>> Your pathetic opinion has been recycled.
>> 
>> Recycled?  Oh I see what you mean. You mean I've chosen a description
>> of your work that so many others have also stated in the past. Hell
>> yes, that is because it is true.
>> 
>>>> Second, things that appear as if they should be "clickable" are not.
>>>> I clicked on "K" and nothing happened. I clicked on "1961" (or any
>>>> other year) and the right pane still says "A Summer Place."
>>> 
>>> True it does for now.
>> 
>> Oh yeah, I also clicked on "The Archies" and nothing happened.
> 
> That's because there is no link dumbass.    <--- *RUDE*
> I have no links on artists names or images.

Why not?

You must think I didn't know there was no link. It's why I said "things 
that appear" to be clickable. Like your alphabet blocks. The page even 
says "Select year or letter." Letters *aren't* selectable. Why aren't they 
links to alphabetic portions of your little database? Else why even bother 
to have them?

Why? Because as I said, you have no sense of design. None at all.

>>> But clik on any link in the left panel and you will see that change.
>> 
>> Whoop-de-do. Still leaves me wondering why you even bother messing with
>> this stuff. Nobody is ever going to visit your pathetic pages on any
>> kind of regular basis. I'll bet your total traffic is from a few Usenet
>> posters when you list a link in your own posts. Most of them have a
>> desire to laugh at your oh-so-amateur code.
>
> Really? They are visiting the site.

Sure. The few Usenet posters I mentioned. You probably got a dozen or so 
hits today!! Why not publish a screenshot of your web stats for the last 
30 days? That'll show us.

> How long did it take youtube.com to get noticed?
> Overnight? No site has ever been put online one day and the next in the
> limelight.

YouTube: much quicker than your years and years of futzing about with this 
Oldies stuff.

>>>> Third, the <title> says "ab" - what's that suppose to mean?
>>>> 
>>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>> 
>>> Says you.
>> 
>> Go right ahead and work ("work!" Ha!) on your silly pages, but stop
>> bothering real people on Usenet with your silly questions.
>> 
>> Remember:  = != ==
> 
> Remember BtS ===>> Beau the shithead.    <--- *RUDE*

Are you done yet?

-- 
   -bts
   -This space for rent, but the price is high

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12143

On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:02:44 -0500, richard <noreply@example.com>
wrote:

>On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty wrote:
>
>> richard the sto0pid wrote:
>> 
>>> http://mroldies.net/test/menu4.html
>> 
>> ..for some degree of "works"... (and a very small one, at that)
>> 
>> First, it is ugly as sin. You have absolutely no sense of design or good 
>> coding practices and never will.
>
>Your pathetic opinion has been recycled.
>
>> 
>> Second, things that appear as if they should be "clickable" are not. I 
>> clicked on "K" and nothing happened. I clicked on "1961" (or any other 
>> year) and the right pane still says "A Summer Place."
>> 
>
>True it does for now.
>But clik on any link in the left panel and you will see that change.
>
>
>> Third, the <title> says "ab" - what's that suppose to mean?
>> 
>> You should find a new hobby.
>
>Says you.

Holy shit, I agree with BtS. That is horribly and ugly.
-- 
To reply via e-mail, remove The Obvious and .invalid from my e-mail address.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#12144

On Wed, 04 Dec 2013 17:20:22 -0800, Evan Platt wrote:

> On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 15:02:44 -0500, richard <noreply@example.com>
> wrote:
>
>>On Wed, 4 Dec 2013 18:55:36 +0000 (UTC), Beauregard T. Shagnasty
>>wrote:
>>
>>> You should find a new hobby.
>>
>>Says you.
>
> Holy shit, I agree with BtS. That is horribly and ugly.

Oh come on... After all the work we've put in on this....

-- 
83. If I'm eating dinner with the hero, put poison in his goblet, then 
    have to leave the table for any reason, I will order new drinks for
    both of us instead of trying to decide whether or not to switch 
    with him. --Peter Anspach's list of things to do as an Evil Overlord

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 3  [1] 2 3  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.php

csiph-web