Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.misc > #2085
| From | Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.misc |
| Subject | Re: 100 Things |
| Date | 2014-05-01 11:01 +1200 |
| Message-ID | <bsddmvFd2otU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | <3SQ7v.155346$AI5.24849@fx32.am4> <ljq5sv$coh$1@dont-email.me> <kY48v.181432$Ey6.180503@fx24.am4> <ljqrp2$pli$1@dont-email.me> <K278v.218753$vB1.137675@fx36.am4> |
BartC wrote: > "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> wrote > >> In one stroke C's for loop removes those issues and makes it manifest in >> the syntax what steps the program will take to control the loop. It >> reduces a loop to the essentials and it means that one compact loop >> control statement can be used in almost all types of loop. IMO that's >> quite brilliant! I'm not surprised if it got copied to other languages. > > Yes, C's for loop is quite powerful and very flexible (although so are 'if' > and 'goto'!). But it is possible to have both that, and a dedicated loop for > the 99% of situations (in my case) where I do need a for-loop to just count > from A to B. Well C++ has a range for construct that simplifies things considerably. For example, given some vector v, for ( auto x : v ) doSomething(x); will iterate through v. I don't see any reason why this couldn't be added to C. -- Ian Collins
Back to comp.lang.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-29 17:57 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-04-30 07:40 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 12:16 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-04-30 13:54 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 14:39 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-04-30 20:18 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 22:40 +0100
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-04-30 22:09 +0000
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 23:36 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 11:03 +1200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 09:47 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-01 00:35 +0100
Re: 100 Things Andy Walker <news@cuboid.co.uk> - 2014-05-01 11:03 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 20:16 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 12:44 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 11:11 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-02 13:32 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 16:42 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-02 17:54 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 11:01 +1200
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-04-30 21:13 -0400
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 09:26 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 16:08 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 13:42 +1200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 09:35 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 21:02 +1200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 10:40 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 22:06 +1200
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 11:08 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 11:02 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 13:57 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 15:12 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 17:18 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 17:04 +0100
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-05-01 18:30 +0000
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 16:08 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-02 08:30 +1200
Re: 100 Things George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-05-03 01:29 -0400
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-03 02:37 -0400
Re: 100 Things George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-05-03 15:39 -0400
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-03 17:30 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-04 20:05 +1200
Re: 100 Things George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-05-04 13:28 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-05 07:40 +1200
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 22:00 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 23:24 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-02 08:59 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-02 09:53 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-02 11:22 +0200
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-05-01 18:26 +0000
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 16:08 -0400
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-05-02 02:49 +0000
Re: C: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-04-30 22:08 -0400
Re: C: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-07-25 23:53 +0100
Re: C: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-07-26 05:38 -0400
Re: C: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-07-26 13:51 +0100
Re: C: 100 Things rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2014-10-25 04:48 -0700
Re: C: 100 Things "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2014-10-25 04:50 -0700
csiph-web