Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.misc > #2083
| From | Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.misc |
| Subject | Re: 100 Things |
| Date | 2014-04-30 22:09 +0000 |
| Organization | Aioe.org NNTP Server |
| Message-ID | <20140430150416.549@kylheku.com> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <kY48v.181432$Ey6.180503@fx24.am4> <ljqrp2$pli$1@dont-email.me> <K278v.218753$vB1.137675@fx36.am4> <ljria6$8ka$1@dont-email.me> <85e8v.227832$gV7.159905@fx21.am4> |
On 2014-04-30, BartC <bc@freeuk.com> wrote: > Not really. What happens here: > > for (i=0; i<strlen(s); ++i) ? > > Is strlen(s) always called once; is it called once if the compiler can > determine that s won't change; or is it called per-iteration? Since strlen is a standard C function, the compiler can know that it has no side effects, and that it can be hoisted out of the loop if the loop doesn't alter the variable s, and doesn't potentially modify any memory that could be inside s.
Back to comp.lang.misc | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
C: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-29 17:57 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-04-30 07:40 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 12:16 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-04-30 13:54 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 14:39 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-04-30 20:18 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 22:40 +0100
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-04-30 22:09 +0000
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-04-30 23:36 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 11:03 +1200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 09:47 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-01 00:35 +0100
Re: 100 Things Andy Walker <news@cuboid.co.uk> - 2014-05-01 11:03 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 20:16 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 12:44 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 11:11 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-02 13:32 +0100
Re: 100 Things "James Harris" <james.harris.1@gmail.com> - 2014-05-02 16:42 +0100
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-02 17:54 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 11:01 +1200
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-04-30 21:13 -0400
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 09:26 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 16:08 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 13:42 +1200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 09:35 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 21:02 +1200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 10:40 +0100
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-01 22:06 +1200
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 11:08 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 11:02 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 13:57 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 15:12 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 17:18 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 17:04 +0100
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-05-01 18:30 +0000
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 16:08 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-02 08:30 +1200
Re: 100 Things George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-05-03 01:29 -0400
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-03 02:37 -0400
Re: 100 Things George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-05-03 15:39 -0400
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-03 17:30 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-04 20:05 +1200
Re: 100 Things George Neuner <gneuner2@comcast.net> - 2014-05-04 13:28 -0400
Re: 100 Things Ian Collins <ian-news@hotmail.com> - 2014-05-05 07:40 +1200
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-01 22:00 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-01 23:24 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-02 08:59 +0200
Re: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-05-02 09:53 +0100
Re: 100 Things "Dmitry A. Kazakov" <mailbox@dmitry-kazakov.de> - 2014-05-02 11:22 +0200
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-05-01 18:26 +0000
Re: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-05-01 16:08 -0400
Re: 100 Things Kaz Kylheku <kaz@kylheku.com> - 2014-05-02 02:49 +0000
Re: C: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-04-30 22:08 -0400
Re: C: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-07-25 23:53 +0100
Re: C: 100 Things "Rod Pemberton" <dont_use_email@xnothavet.cqm> - 2014-07-26 05:38 -0400
Re: C: 100 Things "BartC" <bc@freeuk.com> - 2014-07-26 13:51 +0100
Re: C: 100 Things rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com - 2014-10-25 04:48 -0700
Re: C: 100 Things "Rick C. Hodgin" <rick.c.hodgin@gmail.com> - 2014-10-25 04:50 -0700
csiph-web