Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #30981 > unrolled thread

Open all links in new window

Back to article view | Back to comp.lang.javascript

Contents

  Open all links in new window csakkoni@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 01:44 -0700
    Re: Open all links in new window JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-07-27 17:40 +0700
    Re: Open all links in new window Flng Fck <nothanks@invalid.invalid> - 2016-07-27 15:21 +0200
      Re: Open all links in new window csakkoni@gmail.com - 2016-07-27 23:33 -0700
        Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-07-28 11:02 +0200
          Re: Open all links in new window wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 14:23 -0400
            Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-08-14 23:31 +0200
              Re: Open all links in new window wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> - 2016-08-14 17:43 -0400
                Re: Open all links in new window Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> - 2016-08-18 16:11 -0800
                  Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-08-19 11:52 +0200
                    Re: Open all links in new window wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 01:08 -0400
                      Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-08-20 09:15 +0200
                        Re: Open all links in new window wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> - 2016-08-20 12:09 -0400
                          Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-08-20 21:50 +0200
                          Re: Open all links in new window $Bill <news@todbe.com> - 2016-08-20 17:21 -0700
                        Re: Open all links in new window "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-08-20 19:48 -0700
                          Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-08-21 09:42 +0200
                          Re: Open all links in new window Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2016-08-21 19:29 +1000
                            Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-08-22 00:44 +0200
                              Re: Open all links in new window Dr J R Stockton <reply1600@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2016-08-22 21:58 +0100
                                Re: Open all links in new window $Bill <news@todbe.com> - 2016-08-22 21:52 -0700
                                Re: Open all links in new window "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-08-23 12:23 +0200
            Re: Open all links in new window Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-09-03 19:55 +0000
    Re: Open all links in new window Chandramohan Akkoni <csakkoni@gmail.com> - 2016-08-03 22:28 -0700
      Re: Open all links in new window Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-04 11:05 +0100
        Re: Open all links in new window Chandramohan Akkoni <csakkoni@gmail.com> - 2016-08-04 03:46 -0700
          Re: Open all links in new window Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-04 15:28 +0100
            Re: Open all links in new window Chandramohan Akkoni <csakkoni@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 01:34 -0700
              Re: Open all links in new window Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-05 10:49 +0100
                Re: Open all links in new window Chandramohan Akkoni <csakkoni@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 02:56 -0700
                  Re: Open all links in new window Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-05 15:08 +0100
                    Re: Open all links in new window Chandra <csakkoni@gmail.com> - 2016-08-05 09:44 -0700
                      Re: Open all links in new window Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-08-05 21:26 +0100

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

#30981 — Open all links in new window

Dear Friends,

I have a website www.xyzabc.com (dummy site mentioned) and on the tutorials web page I have 100+ urls. Few assets are linked to my site and few are 3rd party links. I need a script which excludes my links and all 3rd party links are opened in a new tab even if I do not add target="_blank" or onclick().The Code should not be applied manually on all links, it should be one simple code.

Thanks in advance.

Thanks,
Chandramohan

[toc] | [next] | [standalone]

#30983

On Wed, 27 Jul 2016 01:44:57 -0700 (PDT), csakkoni@gmail.com wrote:
> ... it should be one simple code.

Yeah, right...

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30985

Il 27/07/2016 10:44, csakkoni@gmail.com ha scritto:
> Dear Friends,
>
> I have a website www.xyzabc.com (dummy site mentioned) and on the tutorials web page I have 100+ urls. Few assets are linked to my site and few are 3rd party links. I need a script which excludes my links and all 3rd party links are opened in a new tab even if I do not add target="_blank" or onclick().The Code should not be applied manually on all links, it should be one simple code.
>
> Thanks in advance.

I'm your teacher, it's YOU who must do these exercises, not others!
Just do your homework by yourself!
See you on monday, skiver

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30987

On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 6:51:30 PM UTC+5:30, Flng Fck wrote:
> Il 27/07/2016 10:44, csakkoni@gmail.com ha scritto:
> > Dear Friends,
> >
> > I have a website www.xyzabc.com (dummy site mentioned) and on the tutorials web page I have 100+ urls. Few assets are linked to my site and few are 3rd party links. I need a script which excludes my links and all 3rd party links are opened in a new tab even if I do not add target="_blank" or onclick().The Code should not be applied manually on all links, it should be one simple code.
> >
> > Thanks in advance.
> 
> I'm your teacher, it's YOU who must do these exercises, not others!
> Just do your homework by yourself!
> See you on monday, skiver

I'm still a learner, please help me out to do the requirements.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#30988

csakkoni@gmail.com wrote on 28 Jul 2016 in comp.lang.javascript:

> On Wednesday, July 27, 2016 at 6:51:30 PM UTC+5:30, Flng Fck wrote:
>> Il 27/07/2016 10:44, csakkoni@gmail.com ha scritto:
>> > Dear Friends,
>> >
>> > I have a website www.xyzabc.com (dummy site mentioned) and on the
>> > tutor 
> ials web page I have 100+ urls. Few assets are linked to my site and few
> are 3rd party links. I need a script which excludes my links and all 3rd
> party links are opened in a new tab even if I do not add target="_blank"
> or onclick().The Code should not be applied manually on all links, it
> should be one simple code. 
>> >
>> > Thanks in advance.
>> 
>> I'm your teacher, it's YOU who must do these exercises, not others!
>> Just do your homework by yourself!
>> See you on monday, skiver
> 
> I'm still a learner, please help me out to do the requirements.

[You cannot 'do' requirements, imho]

If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises,
[he wouldn't dare, btw,]
would it help my aching back if you 'do' those for me?

After all, it's not the result of the exercise that is important,
as all the learning is in the doing.

Your teacher will have taught you the necessary skills to do this job,
like using your brains, experimenting and debugging.


-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31105

On 7/28/2016 5:02 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>
> If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises,
> [he wouldn't dare, btw,]
> would it help my aching back if you 'do' those for me?
>

So that's what I'm doing wrong.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31108

wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 14 Aug 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> On 7/28/2016 5:02 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>>
>> If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises,
>> [he wouldn't dare, btw,]
>> would it help my aching back if you 'do' those for me?
>>
> 
> So that's what I'm doing wrong.

What's 'that'?

Perhaps you skipped a relevant part of the converstion?

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31109

On 8/14/2016 5:31 PM, Evertjan. wrote:
> wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 14 Aug 2016 in
> comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> On 7/28/2016 5:02 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>>>
>>> If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises,
>>> [he wouldn't dare, btw,]
>>> would it help my aching back if you 'do' those for me?
>>>
>>
>> So that's what I'm doing wrong.
>
> What's 'that'?
>
> Perhaps you skipped a relevant part of the converstion?
>

No I was referring to why my diet & exercise program isn't working.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31114

wmgill wrote:
> On 8/14/2016 5:31 PM, Evertjan. wrote:
>> wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 14 Aug 2016 in
>> comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> On 7/28/2016 5:02 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>>>>
>>>> If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, [he wouldn't dare,
>>>> btw,] would it help my aching back if you 'do' those for me?
>>>>
>>>
>>> So that's what I'm doing wrong.
>>
>> What's 'that'?
>>
>> Perhaps you skipped a relevant part of the converstion?
>>
>
> No I was referring to why my diet & exercise program isn't working.
   The program,whatever it is, CANNOT work; _YOU_ must do it..

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31115

Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote on 19 Aug 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> wmgill wrote:
>> On 8/14/2016 5:31 PM, Evertjan. wrote:
>>> wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 14 Aug 2016 in
>>> comp.lang.javascript:
>>>
>>>> On 7/28/2016 5:02 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>> If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, [he wouldn't dare,
>>>>> btw,] would it help my aching back if you 'do' those for me?
>>>>>
>>>>
>>>> So that's what I'm doing wrong.
>>>
>>> What's 'that'?
>>>
>>> Perhaps you skipped a relevant part of the converstion?
>>>
>>
>> No I was referring to why my diet & exercise program isn't working.

>    The program,whatever it is, CANNOT work; _YOU_ must do it..

Well, at least a programme must be executed by an engine [or q.q. a person 
or persons] to work.

Perhaps a programme does work on one engine [or person],
and fails to execute ["work"?] on another engine [or person].

But first of all, you have to define [or in the case of a discussion have a 
common definition] of "work" and more important imho "not work".

Is "not work" "fails to execute", 
or is it "does not do what I wanted it to do"?




-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31119

On 8/19/2016 5:52 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
> Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote on 19 Aug 2016 in
> comp.lang.javascript:

Jeese I realize there may be a language barrier, but let me recap this 
portion of the conversation:

Evertjan: "If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, would it help my 
aching back if you 'do' those for me?"

Me [responding to the concept of  why having someone else exercise for 
you doesn't accomplish the intended goal.]: "So that's what I'm doing 
wrong." [some might recognize this as humor]

Evertjan  [entirely missing any agreement with the original statement, 
and missing any attempt at humor]:"Perhaps you skipped a relevant part 
of the converstion?"

me [unsuccessfully attempting to clarify]: "No I was referring to why my 
diet & exercise program isn't working."

Robert Baer & Evertjan: [more chastisement and criticism of how slow I 
am at getting their point, while themselves entirely missing any other.]

me [learning that it doesn't matter if the fault is with the transmitter 
or with the receiver some "humor" gets lost]: "never mind."

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31123

wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 20 Aug 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> On 8/19/2016 5:52 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>> Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote on 19 Aug 2016 in
>> comp.lang.javascript:
> 
> Jeese 

I know no one in this thread by that name.

> I realize there may be a language barrier, 

Silly monoglottic idea supposing that others are that illversed in a 
conversation, but nothing is impossible but a contradictio in terminis.

> but let me recap this 
> portion of the conversation:
> 
> Evertjan: "If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, would it help my 
> aching back if you 'do' those for me?"
> 
> Me [responding to the concept of  why having someone else exercise for 
> you doesn't accomplish the intended goal.]: "So that's what I'm doing 
> wrong." [some might recognize this as humor]
> 
> Evertjan  [entirely missing any agreement with the original statement, 
> and missing any attempt at humor]:"Perhaps you skipped a relevant part 
> of the converstion?"
> 
> me [unsuccessfully attempting to clarify]: "No I was referring to why my 
> diet & exercise program isn't working."

Well, you did not quote [the relevant part of] what you were referring to, 
an insult to Usenet Netiquette.

This "not quoting" is, on Usenet, called "skipping", which you did. 

And please remember the many threads in this NG that warned for the notion 
of "programme isn't working". Programmes don't work, they are executed, so 
the executing engine or living entity may not do what you supposed the 
programme-maker ment it to be done.

> Robert Baer & Evertjan: [more chastisement and criticism of how slow I 
> am at getting their point, while themselves entirely missing any other.]

What's "the" point? I love funny-haha, while you may go for funny-peculiar.

> me [learning that it doesn't matter if the fault is with the transmitter 
> or with the receiver some "humor" gets lost]: "never mind."

Never?

Mind over matter, mind is the only thing that can enjoy humour!

What other point is there to humour?

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31129

On 8/20/2016 3:15 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
> wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 20 Aug 2016 in
> comp.lang.javascript:
>
>> On 8/19/2016 5:52 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>>> Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote on 19 Aug 2016 in
>>> comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>> Jeese
>
> I know no one in this thread by that name.
>

Jeese - alternatively jeeze. (American English slang) A semi-expletive 
expression of exasperation.


>> I realize there may be a language barrier,
>
> Silly monoglottic idea supposing that others are that illversed in a
> conversation, ...

(monoglossic?)  Not silly when any honest attempt is made to reach a 
mutual understanding, instead of actively looking for some perceived 
slight. Colloquial expressions are often misinterpreted when the 
listener has a different life experience, possibly a different language 
experience. In fact colloquial expressions can be quite humorous when 
taken literally, that does not infer a superiority / inferiority or any 
other hierarchical relationship.

> ...but nothing is impossible but a contradictio in terminis.

?


>> but let me recap this
>> portion of the conversation:
>>
>> Evertjan: "If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, would it help my
>> aching back if you 'do' those for me?"
>>
>> Me [responding to the concept of  why having someone else exercise for
>> you doesn't accomplish the intended goal.]: "So that's what I'm doing
>> wrong." [some might recognize this as humor]
>>
>> Evertjan  [entirely missing any agreement with the original statement,
>> and missing any attempt at humor]:"Perhaps you skipped a relevant part
>> of the converstion?"
>>
>> me [unsuccessfully attempting to clarify]: "No I was referring to why my
>> diet & exercise program isn't working."
>
> Well, you did not quote [the relevant part of] what you were referring to,
> an insult to Usenet Netiquette.

from my reply:
Evertjan: "If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, would it help my 
aching back if you 'do' those for me?"


parsed thusly:

Evertjan: "If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, would it help my 
aching back if you 'do' those for me?"
^^^^^^^^^

identification of person making the statement that follows.

Evertjan: "If my doctor prescribes me daily exercises, would it help my 
aching back if you 'do' those for me?"
           ^
           opening quotation mark. typically used to indicate a quotation

Evertjan: "If my doctor... <snip>"
            ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
The actual quotation minus asides.  Granted it was minus the header info 
typical in usenet quotes (for pithiness), but the actual words are 
verbatim, and one would expect their original author might recognize them.

BTW I think the correct expression is "a breach of Usenet Netiquette" 
not "an insult to Usenet Netiquette."

>
> This "not quoting" is, on Usenet, called "skipping", which you did.
>

Hopefully my previous remarks also address this.


> And please remember the many threads in this NG that warned for the notion
> of "programme isn't working". Programmes don't work, they are executed, so
> the executing engine or living entity may not do what you supposed the
> programme-maker ment it to be done.
>

Grasping for straws (another colloquial expression. Let me know if you 
don't understand this one) in an effort to justify your comments?

>> Robert Baer & Evertjan: [more chastisement and criticism of how slow I
>> am at getting their point, while themselves entirely missing any other.]
>
> What's "the" point? I love funny-haha, while you may go for funny-peculiar.
>
>> me [learning that it doesn't matter if the fault is with the transmitter
>> or with the receiver some "humor" gets lost]: "never mind."
>
> Never?

Never mind - American colloquial expression meaning forget it, move on, 
drop the subject, etc.

>
> Mind over matter, mind is the only thing that can enjoy humour!
>
> What other point is there to humour?
>

> What's "the" point? I love funny-haha, ...

I'm sure you do. When you actually recognize it.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31130

wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 20 Aug 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> Never mind - American colloquial expression meaning forget it, move on, 

This NG is not an American one.
Expecting American colloquialisms to be understood is not quite cricket. 
Better be glad if we speak the Queen's English.

> drop the subject, etc.

You are not the owner of a subject on Usenet,
nor of my mind.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31131

On 08-20-16 09:09, wmgill wrote:
> On 8/20/2016 3:15 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>> wmgill <webworker1950@gmail.com> wrote on 20 Aug 2016 in
>> comp.lang.javascript:
>>
>>> On 8/19/2016 5:52 AM, Evertjan. wrote:
>>>> Robert Baer <robertbaer@localnet.com> wrote on 19 Aug 2016 in
>>>> comp.lang.javascript:
>>>
>>> Jeese
>>
>> I know no one in this thread by that name.
>>
>
> Jeese - alternatively jeeze. (American English slang) A semi-expletive expression of exasperation.

Geez, jeez, gee whiz - Expletive - short for Jesus.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31132

Evertjan. wrote:
> > Robert Baer wrote:
> > 
> > Jeese 
> 
> I know no one in this thread by that name.


It's a (U.S. English only?) expression:

<https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jeez>

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31133

"Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> wrote on 21 Aug 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> Evertjan. wrote:
>> > Robert Baer wrote:
>> > 
>> > Jeese 
>> 
>> I know no one in this thread by that name.
> 
> 
> It's a (U.S. English only?) expression:
> 
> <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jeez>

Should I suddenly, 
in the midst of a discussion in this NG,
start writing Dutch, mijnheer?

Or Indian English slang, sahib?

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31134

On 21/08/2016 12:48 PM, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> Evertjan. wrote:
>>> Robert Baer wrote:
>>>
>>> Jeese
>>
>> I know no one in this thread by that name.
>
>
> It's a (U.S. English only?) expression:
>
> <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jeez>
>

Perhaps he was really calling his family's butler, Reginald Jeeves, to 
assist?

Andrew Poulos

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31137

Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> wrote on 21 Aug 2016 in 
comp.lang.javascript:

> On 21/08/2016 12:48 PM, Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
>> Evertjan. wrote:
>>>> Robert Baer wrote:
>>>>
>>>> Jeese
>>>
>>> I know no one in this thread by that name.
>>
>>
>> It's a (U.S. English only?) expression:
>>
>> <https://en.wiktionary.org/wiki/jeez>
>>
> 
> Perhaps he was really calling his family's butler, Reginald Jeeves, to 
> assist?

Butlers are OT, even their holyday camps.

-- 
Evertjan.
The Netherlands.
(Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

#31143

In comp.lang.javascript message <XnsA66C78487B00eejj99@194.109.6.166>,
Mon, 22 Aug 2016 00:44:20, Evertjan. <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net>
posted:

>Butlers are OT, even their holyday camps.

I think you mean "Butlins" and "holiday" -
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Butlins

Wiktionary includes : "double (twice, i.e. more than) + Dutch For sense
1: The English, historically, found Dutch (albeit a fellow Western
Germanic language) particularly difficult to understand, so anything
that was completely incomprehensible would be double Dutch, i.e. twice
as hard as Dutch".

-- 
 (c) John Stockton, Surrey, UK.  ¬@merlyn.demon.co.uk   Turnpike v6.05   MIME.
 Merlyn Web Site <                       > - FAQish topics, acronyms, & links.

[toc] | [prev] | [next] | [standalone]

Page 1 of 2  [1] 2  Next page →

Back to top | Article view | comp.lang.javascript

csiph-web