Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #31763

Re: Limit number of function parameters

Path csiph.com!2.us.feeder.erje.net!feeder.erje.net!1.eu.feeder.erje.net!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!feeder5.news.weretis.net!news.solani.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Limit number of function parameters
Date Fri, 2 Dec 2016 20:24:53 +0100
Organization solani.org
Lines 32
Message-ID <o1shp3$9j0$1@solani.org> (permalink)
References <58b433c6-37a6-45de-bc70-05ec835510ff@googlegroups.com> <bfa1965d-1bf2-4024-86e3-ce7535870d2b@googlegroups.com> <17n7y8md13g1b$.kznrbim03ls$.dlg@40tude.net> <2828265.aV6nBDHxoP@PointedEars.de> <o1ctld$g60$1@dont-email.me> <4504999.NdOOCcYCMV@PointedEars.de> <o1d4q7$c90$1@solani.org> <1768059.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> <o1dblq$pr$1@dont-email.me> <o1hora$93u$1@solani.org> <o1iocn$bb6$1@dont-email.me>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
X-Trace solani.org 1480706660 9824 eJwFwYEBwDAEBMCVKB7j9CX2HyF3YVBMOgIeG8t0OZlTArJGPjG9F73dZbFOuC5hNX3/Az4TKBET (2 Dec 2016 19:24:20 GMT)
X-Complaints-To abuse@news.solani.org
NNTP-Posting-Date Fri, 2 Dec 2016 19:24:20 +0000 (UTC)
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:45.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/45.5.1
Cancel-Lock sha1:Q7groCRan/abNsi0GcGRnlxtqyA=
X-User-ID eJwFwQkBACAIA8BK8mxoHAHpH8E7GIUVTtAxmLB0I2Z6q6YETWa/U+yTAfB2Rq0FtFTx6QcU6xEL
In-Reply-To <o1iocn$bb6$1@dont-email.me>
X-NNTP-Posting-Host eJwFwQkBwDAIA0BL4wk0cigU/xJ2BwuJTg+EY7HHu2jkW5NBPRfN/ppVfS7AUd+0KQ7y6rwfIyARnw==
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:31763

Show key headers only | View raw


On 29.11.2016 at 03:15, Scott Sauyet:

> Christoph M. Becker wrote:
>
>> | The ideal number of arguments for a function is zero (niladic). Next 
>> | comes one (monadic), followed closely by two (dyadic). Three arguments
>> | (triadic) should be avoided where possible. More than three
>> | (polyadic) requires very special justification and then shouldn't be 
>> | used anyway.
>>
>> This rule is given in an OOP context, so for functional or procedural
>> style most likely one should be added (niladic functional or procedural
>> functions rarely make sense).
> 
> I agree.  This sounds exactly right.  There are of course uses of unary 
> functions in functional programming, but that's either at the boundary of 
> a program or as thunks of computation set aside to be processed if 
> they're actually needed.  Neither has anything to do with API design.

Hm, did you meant "nullary" instead of "unary"?  For instance, there are
several useful unary functions in Rambda.

>> [1] Clean Code: A Handbook of Agile Software Craftsmanship
> 
> I don't know why that classic has never bubbled its way to the top of my 
> to-read list.  One of these days...

A caveat, though: the author appears to be as opinionated as Douglas
Crockford. :-)

-- 
Christoph M. Becker

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 14:35 -0800
  Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 15:47 -0800
    Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-11-11 21:05 +0700
      Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 06:35 -0800
        Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-11-11 22:01 +0700
          Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-11 16:21 +0100
      Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-11 16:08 +0100
        Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-26 21:09 +0000
          Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-26 22:47 +0100
            Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-11-27 00:11 +0100
              Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-27 00:57 +0100
                Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-27 01:08 +0000
                Re: Limit number of function parameters (was:Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form?) "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-11-28 18:17 +0100
                Re: Limit number of function parameters (was:Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form?) Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-29 02:15 +0000
                Re: Limit number of function parameters "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-12-02 20:24 +0100
                Re: Limit number of function parameters Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-12-03 01:58 +0000

csiph-web