Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #31745
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? |
| Date | 2016-11-27 00:57 +0100 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <1768059.oMNUckLgyt@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <17n7y8md13g1b$.kznrbim03ls$.dlg@40tude.net> <2828265.aV6nBDHxoP@PointedEars.de> <o1ctld$g60$1@dont-email.me> <4504999.NdOOCcYCMV@PointedEars.de> <o1d4q7$c90$1@solani.org> |
Christoph M. Becker wrote:
> On 26.11.2016 at 22:47, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> Scott Sauyet wrote:
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Lesson to be learned: Design functions/methods to accept references to
>>>> parameter/option objects, and not more than 5 arguments [unless it is a
>>>> list of values of equal meaning, see e.g. Math.max()]. Otherwise
>>>> nobody is going to remember the correct argument order, you will be
>>>> sacrificing flexibility, [ ... ]
>>> Why five? That still seems far too many for almost every case. Three
>>> seems to me a much better guideline. Of course everyone will draw these
>>> lines differently for themselves, but I was wondering: do you have a
>>> specific reason for that number?
>> Yes.
>
> Which is?
Maybe it was like Douglas Adams picked the number that was going to be the
“Answer to the Ultimate Question of Life, The Universe, and Everything”:
“The answer to this is very simple. It was a joke. It had to be a number,
an ordinary, smallish number, and I chose that one. Binary
representations, base thirteen, Tibetan monks are all complete nonsense.
I sat at my desk, stared into the garden and thought '42 will do'.
I typed it out. End of story.”
—Douglas Adams in <news:alt.fan.douglas-adams>,
<news:adamsd.1102700746A@news.cerf.net>
So, why did I pick 5? It just seemed practical at the time, and it still
does. It is a reasonably small number, which is important for a short code
line length, particularly if you want to be descriptive in your parameter
names, but not so small as to be overly restrictive in a rule of thumb.
If you are human(oid), and still equipped with all fingers (or toes), you
can count the arguments/parameters of the function on those using only one
limb. Maybe it is easier to develop a mnemonic because of that.
In hindsight, there is also an oft-cited theory in the cognitive sciences
(which I learned of when studying machine-computer interaction) which is
usually interpreted so that humans’ working memory can hold up to 7 ± 2
items; so, 5 would be a number that every human(oid) could manage:
<https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/The_Magical_Number_Seven,_Plus_or_Minus_Two>
Finally, I think that I can remember the correct order of 5 parameters
without consuming too much caffeine.
--
PointedEars
FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix>
<https://github.com/PointedEars> | <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/>
Twitter: @PointedEars2 | Please do not cc me./Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 14:35 -0800
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 15:47 -0800
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-11-11 21:05 +0700
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 06:35 -0800
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-11-11 22:01 +0700
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-11 16:21 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-11 16:08 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-26 21:09 +0000
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-26 22:47 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-11-27 00:11 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-27 00:57 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-27 01:08 +0000
Re: Limit number of function parameters (was:Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form?) "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-11-28 18:17 +0100
Re: Limit number of function parameters (was:Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form?) Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-29 02:15 +0000
Re: Limit number of function parameters "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-12-02 20:24 +0100
Re: Limit number of function parameters Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-12-03 01:58 +0000
csiph-web