Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #31744
| From | "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? |
| Date | 2016-11-27 00:11 +0100 |
| Organization | solani.org |
| Message-ID | <o1d4q7$c90$1@solani.org> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <bfa1965d-1bf2-4024-86e3-ce7535870d2b@googlegroups.com> <17n7y8md13g1b$.kznrbim03ls$.dlg@40tude.net> <2828265.aV6nBDHxoP@PointedEars.de> <o1ctld$g60$1@dont-email.me> <4504999.NdOOCcYCMV@PointedEars.de> |
On 26.11.2016 at 22:47, Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: > Scott Sauyet wrote: > >> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote: >>> Lesson to be learned: Design functions/methods to accept references to >>> parameter/option objects, and not more than 5 arguments [unless it is a >>> list of values of equal meaning, see e.g. Math.max()]. Otherwise nobody >>> is going to remember the correct argument order, you will be sacrificing >>> flexibility, [ ... ] >> >> Why five? That still seems far too many for almost every case. Three >> seems to me a much better guideline. Of course everyone will draw these >> lines differently for themselves, but I was wondering: do you have a >> specific reason for that number? > > Yes. Which is? -- Christoph M. Becker
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 14:35 -0800
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-10 15:47 -0800
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-11-11 21:05 +0700
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? jonas.thornvall@gmail.com - 2016-11-11 06:35 -0800
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? JJ <jj4public@vfemail.net> - 2016-11-11 22:01 +0700
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-11 16:21 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-11 16:08 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-26 21:09 +0000
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-26 22:47 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-11-27 00:11 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-11-27 00:57 +0100
Re: Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form? Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-27 01:08 +0000
Re: Limit number of function parameters (was:Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form?) "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-11-28 18:17 +0100
Re: Limit number of function parameters (was:Why does savepng workl with eventlistener but not by call from form?) Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-11-29 02:15 +0000
Re: Limit number of function parameters "Christoph M. Becker" <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2016-12-02 20:24 +0100
Re: Limit number of function parameters Scott Sauyet <scott@sauyet.com> - 2016-12-03 01:58 +0000
csiph-web