Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29554
| From | Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: passing a set of numbers to a function |
| Date | 2016-02-06 04:50 +0100 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <n93qit$hjd$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | (6 earlier) <58b65993-5943-4f8e-a4e2-9e97bb1feea3@googlegroups.com> <n926p5$rqt$1@news.albasani.net> <7de86700-d479-49ff-819f-8187843a09b8@googlegroups.com> <n92dl3$bm5$1@news.albasani.net> <238f9324-a921-43ca-b10f-1f171ccc18f4@googlegroups.com> |
On 02/05/2016 19:48, Scott Sauyet wrote: > Stefan Weiss wrote: >> Scott Sauyet wrote: >>> [ ... ] It's not too strange to assume that a (finite) set can >>> be iterated. Of course this makes no sense at all for an >>> uncountably infinite set. >> >> Or even countably infinite :) > > Ahh, but here's where a little mathematical background was required. > > :-) > > `countably infinite` means in essence that it is of the same size as > the set of natural numbers. (And same size means that there is a > 1 - 1 mapping between them.) A countably infinite set can be iterated, > but you'll never finish. That's one way to think of streams. If finishing is not important, I can iterate over ℝ (uncountably infinite) just as well as over ℕ (countably infinite): I start with 1, 2, 3... etc; when I get to the end of the natural numbers, I'll just go the opposite direction. Kidding aside, you were talking about using storage mechanisms in sets for iteration. I think that for this purpose, any size of infinity is large enough. >> I recently read Logicomix, a fascinating graphic novel about the >> search for the foundations of mathematics, loosely based on >> Russel's life. > > Sounds fun. Was Kurt Gödel the arch-villain, destroying everything our > brave hero tried to build? :-) Pretty much, in the end. It felt like a bit of an anticlimax, even though the outcome was inevitable. Gödel presents his proof in front of an auditorium including Hilbert and Russell, and von Neumann mutters "It's all over" (this never actually happened, but it might have, and the authors fully acknowledge taking some artistic licence here and there). I also got the impression that the real hidden killer was insanity - it's surprising how many of the mathematicians involved in this lost their minds. Logicomix is worth a read, if you like this kind of story telling. I thought I'd stumbled across an obscure gem when I found it in a bookstore in Vienna, but apparently it made #1 on the New York Times bestseller list for graphic novels at some point. It's not 100% historically accurate, and some of the more advanced concepts are simplified, but overall I was deeply impressed by how the authors managed to transform such an abstract topic into an enjoyable story. - stefan
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
passing a set of numbers to a function Matheus Suffi <matheus.suffi40@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 04:45 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-25 10:51 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-29 03:57 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-28 23:19 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 10:09 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:20 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 12:23 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-29 14:50 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 16:11 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-30 10:10 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 08:35 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-30 10:34 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 18:53 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-31 14:50 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:56 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:02 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 18:10 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-29 09:38 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 20:17 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-29 20:08 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 10:32 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-29 14:53 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 06:26 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-29 14:19 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 08:38 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 13:54 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 10:11 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 15:38 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@geostat.dk> - 2016-01-29 20:13 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-29 20:46 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 16:59 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-12 12:03 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-02 11:18 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-02-02 12:31 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:42 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-04 15:38 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-04 17:33 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 16:19 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 14:06 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:45 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 14:34 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 15:42 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 16:04 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:48 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:50 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-02-06 10:05 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 23:30 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 17:32 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 14:13 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 17:15 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:19 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 13:43 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:08 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-04 20:25 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-02-05 10:51 +0000
csiph-web