Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #29571
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2016-02-06 17:32 -0800 |
| References | (9 earlier) <n92dl3$bm5$1@news.albasani.net> <238f9324-a921-43ca-b10f-1f171ccc18f4@googlegroups.com> <n93qit$hjd$1@news.albasani.net> <5001e810-22bb-4895-815a-65c28d2ff337@googlegroups.com> <n95s61$sma$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Message-ID | <558ce9d1-9bff-4b05-bdaf-02ea171b1ea4@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: passing a set of numbers to a function |
| From | Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> |
Stefan Weiss wrote: > Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote: >> Stefan Weiss wrote: >>> If finishing is not important, I can iterate over ℝ (uncountably >>> infinite) just as well as over ℕ (countably infinite): I start with 1, >>> 2, 3... etc; when I get to the end of the natural numbers, I'll just go >>> the opposite direction. >> >> [snip] >> >> No, you can't. >> >> <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Cantor's_diagonal_argument> > > It was a joke. I thought "when I get to the end of the natural numbers" > was obvious enough, but... The premise was that the iteration over > natural numbers would "never finish". That implies a non-zero duration > for a single iteration and an amount of time that is either finite or at > best (countably) infinite. Under these constraints, both iterators > produce the same series. I had responded earlier to Stefan's post. Where it went, Google only knows. I had guessed his response was a joke, but it wasn't clear, so, while I didn't point to Cantor's proof, I did discuss the difference, and how countable sets can be iterated/streamed. It might take a while to reach, say M_74207281 [1], there is no actual number which is theoretically out of bounds. (I also expressed my sorrow to realize that Hilbert was alive to see Gödel undermining his life's work. It was probably harder for him than for Russell. I don't know why I assumed he had died before then.) In any case, these are an interesting variant of sets, and Ben has shown that they do have at least some practical uses. We now return you to your regularly scheduled barrage of USENET pedantry and individual quibbles over the usage of the word "Javascript". [1]: <https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Great_Internet_Mersenne_Prime_Search> -- Scott
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
passing a set of numbers to a function Matheus Suffi <matheus.suffi40@gmail.com> - 2016-01-25 04:45 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-25 10:51 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-29 03:57 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Joao Rodrigues <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2016-01-28 23:19 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 10:09 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-29 10:20 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 12:23 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-29 14:50 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 16:11 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-30 10:10 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 08:35 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-30 10:34 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-30 18:53 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-31 14:50 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-31 09:56 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-02-01 11:02 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-01 18:10 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2016-01-29 09:38 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-01-29 20:17 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-29 20:08 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 10:32 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2016-01-29 14:53 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 06:26 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-01-29 14:19 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 08:38 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 13:54 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-01-29 10:11 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 15:38 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Anders Wegge Keller <wegge@geostat.dk> - 2016-01-29 20:13 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-01-29 20:46 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-01-29 16:59 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Erwin Moller <erwinmollerusenet@xs4all.nl> - 2016-02-12 12:03 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-02 11:18 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Aleksandro <aleksandro@gmx.com> - 2016-02-02 12:31 -0300
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-02-04 10:42 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-04 15:38 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2016-02-04 17:33 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-04 16:19 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 14:06 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:45 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 14:34 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 15:42 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 16:04 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 10:48 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 04:50 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2016-02-06 10:05 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Stefan Weiss <krewecherl@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 23:30 +0100
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-06 17:32 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 14:13 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 17:15 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 05:19 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-05 13:43 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2016-02-05 06:08 -0800
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function Ben Bacarisse <ben.usenet@bsb.me.uk> - 2016-02-04 20:25 +0000
Re: passing a set of numbers to a function John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2016-02-05 10:51 +0000
csiph-web