Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #13275

Re: A way of displaying an active Script

Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: A way of displaying an active Script
References <KFY94oUiriePFw3k@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <unkmn7h6bqoti42d4bvtejcah5957jtg7r@4ax.com> <arbZDQPqFKfPFw$f@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> <m2vclfgkal.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> <Cle$Q1L9U1fPFwsL@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid>
Organization Eric Conspiracy Secret Labs
From Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org>
Date 2012-04-07 01:11 +0200
Message-ID <m28vi8cv65.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl> (permalink)

Show all headers | View raw

Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> writes:

> In comp.lang.javascript message <m2vclfgkal.fsf@nntp.bednarz.nl>, Thu, 5
> Apr 2012 01:16:18, Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> posted:

I'm pretty sure I haven't read or posted anything in the de.* hierarchy
in recent years, still this doesn't look anything I'd like to be held
responsible for. I don't have a point, btw, I just like to claim space.

>> Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> writes:
>>
>>> You can now look at <http://www.merlyn.demon.co.uk/js-boxes.htm#SSE>
>>
>> There is no nice way to say this, so I'll say it my way:
>> Next time, *please* warn people who are not color-blind. Above the
>> URL, not below. TIA.
>
> I wonder what that means (except for TIA).

It means either your or my color perception might be slightly off.

>>> [...] Yes, in FF11, the Title can be made visible just
>>> above the Body's border
>>
>>The what?
>
> The Title.  All the best Web pages have a Title, supplied within <title>
> ... </title> - validation calls for it.  The document element has, in at
> least one browser, a read/write property addressable as document.title .
>
> The Body is non-mandatory for Web pages,

What, according to you, is validation, and what kind of validation does
not call for a body element?

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

A way of displaying an active Script Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-02 23:40 +0100
  Re: A way of displaying an active Script Dr.Kral@nyc.rr.com - 2012-04-03 14:58 -0400
    Re: A way of displaying an active Script Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-04-03 21:17 +0200
      Re: A way of displaying an active Script John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-04-04 15:50 +0100
        Re: A way of displaying an active Script Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-05 20:05 +0100
          Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-06 10:39 +0200
            Re: A way of displaying an active Script "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-04-06 15:03 +0000
              Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-06 21:20 +0200
                Re: A way of displaying an active Script "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-04-06 19:45 +0000
                [OT] Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-06 22:39 +0200
                Re: [OT] Re: A way of displaying an active Script "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-04-06 22:18 +0000
                Re: [OT] Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-07 00:40 +0200
                Re: [OT] Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-07 02:33 +0200
                Re: [OT] Re: A way of displaying an active Script Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-07 19:25 +0100
                Re: [OT] Re: A way of displaying an active Script "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-04-08 07:38 +0000
                Re: A way of displaying an active Script Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-07 19:20 +0100
                Re: A way of displaying an active Script "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-04-08 07:52 +0000
  Re: A way of displaying an active Script Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-04-03 12:44 -0700
    Re: A way of displaying an active Script Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-04 20:30 +0100
      Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-05 01:16 +0200
        Re: A way of displaying an active Script Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-06 21:42 +0100
          Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-07 01:11 +0200
            Re: A way of displaying an active Script Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-04-07 01:52 +0200
            Re: A way of displaying an active Script Dr J R Stockton <reply1214@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-04-08 19:48 +0100
              Re: A way of displaying an active Script "Jukka K. Korpela" <jkorpela@cs.tut.fi> - 2012-04-09 08:17 +0300
                Re: A way of displaying an active Script Eric Bednarz <bednarz@fahr-zur-hoelle.org> - 2012-04-09 09:06 +0000
          Re: A way of displaying an active Script John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-04-07 11:21 +0100
            Re: A way of displaying an active Script Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-04-07 12:26 +0100
              Re: A way of displaying an active Script John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-04-07 15:16 +0100

csiph-web