Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #12982
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Subject | Re: onkeydown and onkeyup |
| From | "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> |
| References | (4 earlier) <fc24m71e51g23002bfev0diu0ougats06a@4ax.com> <9sp6n1Fqr9U1@mid.individual.net> <t62fm71uj4dslgk5fialnf9qe0l4di6ou9@4ax.com> <XnsA01BDEA81896Ceejj99@194.109.133.133> <l3ffm75n19ptorsof3jjr257t1vomb09ut@4ax.com> |
| Message-ID | <XnsA01EAE1725F77eejj99@194.109.133.133> (permalink) |
| Date | 2012-03-22 16:06 +0000 |
Gene Wirchenko wrote on 20 mrt 2012 in comp.lang.javascript: > Evertjan: > If you did not > keep trying to stomp me down to doing it your way, I would not keep > posting my view. > > I believe that it is important to consider more than one way of > doing things. Questioning comfortable things can be the start to > getting something better, or it can provide reasoned argument for why > the extant way is good. [...] > Your personal need to stomp on someone doing things differently > is not terribly important. "stomp down" in slang English seems to be an attack when you are down already. [In Dutch "stomp" means "blunt"]. Do you feel down on the ground already? It seems you do not want to conduct a discussion on it's contents, and see bona fide points that you perhaps do not agree with as personal attacks. Why this paranoia? Discussions where the parties agree about the subject are not usefull and are only fruitfull inside sects where conflicting views are kept away forcefully. Shall we go back to the subject at hand, javascript discussion on the scale of a usenet NG? -- Evertjan. The Netherlands. (Please change the x'es to dots in my emailaddress)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-13 22:35 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-13 22:40 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Norman Peelman <npeelmandog@cfl.rr.com> - 2012-03-14 17:59 -0400
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 15:10 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-14 17:57 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 19:39 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-03-14 23:53 -0300
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 20:26 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-14 22:13 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-14 22:40 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-15 08:25 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "J.R." <groups_jr-1@yahoo.com.br> - 2012-03-18 13:07 -0300
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-19 00:05 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-03-19 09:54 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-19 12:37 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-03-19 20:53 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-19 16:20 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-03-20 12:12 +1100
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-19 18:45 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-03-20 17:17 +1100
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-20 16:37 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-20 19:25 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Dr J R Stockton <reply1212@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-03-21 19:27 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-21 19:19 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-03-22 16:06 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-22 09:59 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-03-22 18:10 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-03-22 19:19 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Mike Duffy <Use_guestbook_page@website.in.sig> - 2012-03-23 01:44 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-22 12:36 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-03-23 09:05 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-03-19 15:49 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Ross McKay <au.org.zeta.at.rosko@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-16 12:59 +1100
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-15 21:58 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Ross McKay <au.org.zeta.at.rosko@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-16 18:13 +1100
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 08:11 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-03-16 16:58 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-16 12:05 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Dr J R Stockton <reply1211@merlyn.demon.co.uk.not.invalid> - 2012-03-17 19:13 +0000
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Ross McKay <au.org.zeta.at.rosko@invalid.invalid> - 2012-03-18 12:46 +1100
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-03-17 19:13 -0700
Re: onkeydown and onkeyup Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-03-17 23:27 -0700
csiph-web