Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #10645

Re: Perhaps OT ?

From "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript
Subject Re: Perhaps OT ?
Date 2012-01-27 08:21 -0700
Message-ID <9oftopFihaU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink)
References <9ob81lFcijU1@mid.individual.net> <0n41i7doh8v0e053hk0ihpbj3b55ga64am@4ax.com> <9odumfFp7iU1@mid.individual.net> <timstreater-9FC8A9.21502726012012@news.individual.net> <2ff290f8-a6e0-4457-a682-c1942f4fcc79@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com>

Show all headers | View raw


I believe what he wants is a size="2" combobox with options listed
with full names, which is emulated by what I posted (more or less
given styling differences per browser).


    Yes, that is what I want.  But, since I need 4 of these <select> 
comboboxes underneath each other in a vertical column, I need to think of 
some efficient means of just using one set of select options (i.e., fifty 
U.S. States, and ten provinces.)

    Now, I'm beginning to think, that  I should leave the four 2-char <text> 
fields in place, and when focus is on any of them, I should have some way 
for the user to activate a 'click' event to bring up a single <select> 
element and its 60-odd options.   Hmmmm ...

    Again, Michael has given me a solution, but I'm still puzzling over how 
to make it more efficient and less obtrusive.

    btw, I think I might place my page on one of my web sites for you folks 
to look at to give you a better perspective.

    Going golfing now -- but thinking about this :)))

Thank y'all.

-Mel Smith
 

Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-25 13:46 -0700
  Re: Perhaps OT ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 16:19 -0800
    Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-25 18:53 -0700
      Re: Perhaps OT ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 19:09 -0800
        Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-26 08:39 -0700
          Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-27 14:58 -0700
            Re: Perhaps OT ? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-01-28 16:38 +1100
              Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-28 08:38 -0700
              Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-28 16:28 -0700
                Re: Perhaps OT ? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-01-29 11:27 +1100
                Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-29 09:26 -0700
  Re: Perhaps OT ? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-01-25 15:43 -0800
    Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-26 14:25 -0700
      Re: Perhaps OT ? Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-01-26 21:50 +0000
        Re: Perhaps OT ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 16:05 -0800
          Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-27 08:21 -0700
            Re: Perhaps OT ? Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 19:09 +0000
              Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-29 09:39 -0700

csiph-web