Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #10738
| From | "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: Perhaps OT ? |
| Date | 2012-01-29 09:39 -0700 |
| Message-ID | <9olb1nFo5oU1@mid.individual.net> (permalink) |
| References | (2 earlier) <9odumfFp7iU1@mid.individual.net> <timstreater-9FC8A9.21502726012012@news.individual.net> <2ff290f8-a6e0-4457-a682-c1942f4fcc79@k10g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <9oftopFihaU1@mid.individual.net> <m3TWEKFTfEJPFwpe@invalid.uk.co.demon.merlyn.invalid> |
Dr J said:
> If you can assume that the user has a working keyboard, why not put
> in the column four <input type=text value="??" size=3 ...> (size 3 to
> show the typist that there are only two letters), and, onChange or
> otherwise, look up the entries in a 60-entry table. If any fail to
> match, then pop up a small window in which the selection may be made by
> full name, perhaps by 61 radiobuttons, all initially clear - 50 States,
> 10 Provinces, and "none of those".
>
Yes, those fields are already there in that restricted horizontal space,
and I would like to continue to use them with an added
'verification/selection' process.
Your thoughts/suggestions and those examples of Jeff North will help me
to resolve this issue (and I hope without getting bogged down too deeply)
Have you visited the site and looked at the current work. I'd hate to
change the whole thing, but would like to add a bit of help.
> BTW, are you disenfranchising those of Puerto Rico, Guam, US Samoa,
> etc.; and those of St Pierre & Miquelon etc.?
The last I heard was the St. Pierre and Miquelon were a part of France, and
our Senior Park is used only by 'freezing' Canadians and Americans, and
those hardy permanent residents who 'fry' here at 115 degrees F during the
summer.
Thanks for the suggestions !
-Mel
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-25 13:46 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 16:19 -0800
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-25 18:53 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-25 19:09 -0800
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-26 08:39 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-27 14:58 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-01-28 16:38 +1100
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-28 08:38 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-28 16:28 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? Jeff North <jnorthau@yahoo.com.au> - 2012-01-29 11:27 +1100
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-29 09:26 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-01-25 15:43 -0800
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-26 14:25 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2012-01-26 21:50 +0000
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 16:05 -0800
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-27 08:21 -0700
Re: Perhaps OT ? Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 19:09 +0000
Re: Perhaps OT ? "Mel Smith" <med_cutout_syntel@aol.com> - 2012-01-29 09:39 -0700
csiph-web