Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #16059
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
|---|---|
| Date | 2012-09-20 11:09 -0700 |
| References | (1 earlier) <50578d7e$0$65454$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <l7ydnesRKuqXO8rNnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@westnet.com.au> <5057b106$0$65467$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <8604488f-27b3-4047-be76-1792f5508e69@p22g2000vby.googlegroups.com> <505a2042$0$65474$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> |
| Message-ID | <90f0c3c1-7f4c-40c5-af72-e82954eff0f2@googlegroups.com> (permalink) |
| Subject | Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? |
| From | David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> |
On Wednesday, September 19, 2012 3:42:59 PM UTC-4, S.T. wrote: > On 9/19/2012 12:48 AM, Adam Silver wrote: > > > > > It seems that you miss all the important information provided by > > > Thomas and David. It is worth giving their advice some thought and > > > action. We are actually rather fortunate to have them answer > > > questions. > > > > > > > This sort of pandering and complicity is among the reasons for the > > general lack of activity in this newsgroup. As usual, your primary mission here is to insult the group. What is that in aid of? > > > > Pointed Ears sometimes provides answers and discussion so long as it can > > be interspersed with ridicule. He's also very adept at not providing > > value but still including the ridicule. I think labeling his > > participation as "fortunate" might be generous. And your "participation" is...? :) > > > > Anything of merit re: discussion of JS to David Mark's name is contained > > on a couple pages on his site. His community interaction, here and > > elsewhere, consists almost entirely of retreaded arguments in some > > bizarre javascript-library war, a war in which he's the only participant > > (unless someone like me finally takes the bait and has a little fun > > watching what happens). I don't see any particular useful value in what > > you seem to admire on this front, but to each his own. And your other mission is to spew nonsense about me? What do you get out of that? Oh wait, I see; you are having a "little fun" (very little I would think). Try to find a life. ;) > > > > Unsolicited advice: you're developing what looks to be an interesting > > project. Probably overkill for my own needs but I can understand the > > appeal for more dedicated JS developers. That said, the more David > > hijacks it as ammo for his crusade, the less likelihood it will gain > > traction in the developer community. You truly are clueless. Referring to the "Jessie" project, right? :) > > > > https://twitter.com/Cinsoft/status/240371150419529729 > > https://twitter.com/Cinsoft/status/243477300178464768 > > https://twitter.com/Cinsoft/status/245257556388368384 Why do you seem to follow my every move online if you don't find posts useful? Do you get up every morning and say: today I will read posts by David Mark? And then post anonymously in groups where my opinions (for lack of a better word) are clearly not welcome? You really need a life. ;)
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 11:23 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-17 13:52 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-18 08:36 +1000
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-17 16:24 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 20:29 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? Adam Silver <adambsilver@gmail.com> - 2012-09-19 00:48 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-19 12:43 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-20 11:09 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 20:21 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-18 16:49 +0200
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-18 12:49 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> - 2012-09-19 12:29 +0000
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-19 05:44 -0700
Libraries (was: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-20 02:57 +0200
Re: Libraries (was: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest?) David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-19 18:14 -0700
Re: Libraries (was: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest?) Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-09-20 07:26 -0700
Re: Libraries Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-20 17:27 +0200
Re: Libraries Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-09-20 10:48 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-19 12:00 -0700
csiph-web