Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #15994
| From | "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| Subject | Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? |
| Message-ID | <201209191229123103@webnews.fastusenet.org> (permalink) |
| References | <8c2d2323-b80c-4866-94b2-d36914d2b10e@v15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <50578d7e$0$65454$742ec2ed@news.sonic.net> <l7ydnesRKuqXO8rNnZ2dnUVZ_gadnZ2d@westnet.com.au> |
| Date | 2012-09-19 12:29 +0000 |
Andrew Poulos wrote: > S.T. wrote: > >> By the way, this newsgroup is exceptionally (read: fanatically) >> anti-jQuery and it's siblings. By referencing jQuery its only a matter >> of time until the loons emerge. If the links I provided don't suffice, >> unless you want to code this up from scratch without using one of the >> popular libraries you'll be better served asking on Stack Overflow or, >> if you would prefer a bit more casual format, maybe on Reddit: >> http://www.reddit.com/r/jquery > > Its a pretty sad way to defend your support of jq. If you'd left off the > last paragraph I would've thought your post well considered. I almost agree. This is overblown and less than helpful. But even the FAQ does point people interested in the popular libraries to the libraries' sites. It's clear that for the most part questions about how to use these libraries are not well-received on comp.lang.javascript. A short sentence that pointed that out would have been fine. This plaintive cry is too much. -- Scott
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? justaguy <lichunshen84@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 11:23 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-17 13:52 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2012-09-18 08:36 +1000
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-17 16:24 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 20:29 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? Adam Silver <adambsilver@gmail.com> - 2012-09-19 00:48 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-19 12:43 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-20 11:09 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-17 20:21 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-18 16:49 +0200
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-18 12:49 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "Scott Sauyet" <3103invalid@webnews.fastusenet.org> - 2012-09-19 12:29 +0000
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-19 05:44 -0700
Libraries (was: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest?) Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-20 02:57 +0200
Re: Libraries (was: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest?) David Mark <dmark.cinsoft@gmail.com> - 2012-09-19 18:14 -0700
Re: Libraries (was: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest?) Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-09-20 07:26 -0700
Re: Libraries Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-09-20 17:27 +0200
Re: Libraries Scott Sauyet <scott.sauyet@gmail.com> - 2012-09-20 10:48 -0700
Re: How difficult would it be to create simple autosuggest? "S.T." <anon@anon.com> - 2012-09-19 12:00 -0700
csiph-web