Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #21059
| Path | csiph.com!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!npeer.de.kpn-eurorings.net!npeer-ng0.de.kpn-eurorings.net!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool3.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Message-ID | <2725916.yAnYnyUf7L@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <usenet@PointedEars.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | Tue, 27 Aug 2013 23:02:47 +0200 |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.10.5 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| X-Face | %i>XG-yXR'\"2P/C_aO%~;2o~?g0pPKmbOw^=NT`tprDEf++D.m7"}HW6.#=U:?2GGctkL,f89@H46O$ASoW&?s}.k+&.<b';Md8`dH6iqhT)6C^.Px|[=M@7=Ik[_w<%n1Up"LPQNu2m8|L!/3iby{-]A+#YE}Kl{Cw$\U!kD%K}\2jz"QQP6Uqr],./"?;=4v |
| Face | 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 |
| Subject | Re: Multiple image preload construct? |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <kvidas$lib$1@news.albasani.net> <kvire7$ca3$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Lines | 140 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 27 Aug 2013 23:04:29 CEST |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 9ddc63b4.newsspool1.arcor-online.net |
| X-Trace | DXC=k`LDUCXbl>FA<A_d>@P]\Dic==]BZ:afN4Fo<]lROoRAnkgeX?EC@@@0E8X5N4L0EBDZm8W4\YJNLb@mF9jNikdEDZIgZChmYcK<P<m]D^VcDA |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet-abuse@arcor.de |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:21059 |
Show key headers only | View raw
Ken wrote:
^^^
Please fix, Ken #4711.
> On 27.08.2013 09:32, Tuxedo wrote:
>> How can this be constructed in a simple way to run the function block
>> after two images have preloaded? Eg. after:
>> preload_img.src = 'image_1.jpg' AND 'image_2.jpg';
>> .... is complete?
>
> You need to keep track with a counter, for example:
>
> var images = ['img1url', 'img2url', 'img2url', ...];
>
> /// function to load all images in an array with urls
In these languages (not C#), documentation comments are better written
/*… */, for “//” introduces single-line comments that are best used only
for disabling code (and be used carefully on Usenet with its not fully
defined line length).
> function loadImages(imgs, callback) {
>
> var i = 0, img, count = imgs.length, result = [];
>
> /// create images
> for(; img = imgs[i]; i++) {
That is awful code style for array iteration, in probably every language of
the C family. Consider this instead:
for (var i = 0, count = len = imgs.length; i < len; ++i)
{
> var newImage = new Image();
> result.push(newImage);
> newImage.onload = handleLoad;
> newImage.src = img;
It makes more sense to append the object reference to the Array *after* the
object is prepared:
var newImage = new Image();
newImage.onload = handleLoad;
newImage.src = img;
result.push(newImage);
> }
>
> function handleLoad() {
> count--;
> if (count === 0) callback(result);
Consider
if (!--count)
{
callback(result);
}
or
if (--count === 0)
{
callback(result);
}
You could also count upwards (naming the variable “loadCount”, for example).
And you actually need only one Array, as ECMAScript Arrays are not typed by
default:
var img = new Image();
…
img.src = imgs[i];
imgs[i] = img;
It is even questionable to have the Image instance references in an Array,
as then there is no random access to them, for example by name or ID.
> }
> }
>
> Now you can call the function:
>
> loadImages(myArray, loadDone);
>
> function loadDone(result) {
> console.log('All images loaded!');
> /// result contains an array with the Image elements
> }
Function expressions are widely supported by now, especially where
console.log() is supported [1]:
loadImages(myArray, function (result) {
console.log('All images loaded!');
/* result contains an array with the Image elements */
});
[1] <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix?filter=function>
Using your way is only necessary with event-handler properties, and probably
only for *older* versions of JScript/IE (to work around the memory leak
issue).
In your code you declare 3 global properties that should be avoided by using
namespacing (for lack of a better word):
var namespace = {
…
loadImages: function (/* … */) {
// …
}
};
or, if necessary, by module pattern:
var module = (function () {
var _myPrivateVar;
…
return {
…
loadImages: function (/* … */) {
// … access _myPrivateVar
}
};
}());
See <http://PointeEars.de/scripts/test/hoverMe> for a better approach.
(Although the image references are currently borken, the code should work.)
--
PointedEars
Twitter: @PointedEars2
Please do not Cc: me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 16:32 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 17:06 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Danny <dann90038@gmail.com> - 2013-08-27 10:29 -0700
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 13:32 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Tuxedo <tuxedo@mailinator.com> - 2013-08-27 20:54 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:19 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 01:37 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:47 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-27 23:02 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-08-27 23:20 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 01:27 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Cezary Tomczyk <cezary.tomczyk@gmail.com> - 2013-08-29 03:56 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-29 15:16 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 18:43 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 02:08 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 19:49 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 03:17 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 20:35 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Dr J R Stockton <reply1300@merlyn.demon.co.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-29 19:32 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-28 16:20 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-28 11:21 +1000
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Ken <usenet-so@abdiassoftware.com> - 2013-08-27 20:48 -0500
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-28 13:43 +1000
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-29 10:00 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Andrew Poulos <ap_prog@hotmail.com> - 2013-08-30 07:25 +1000
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-30 10:11 +0100
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Christoph Michael Becker <cmbecker69@arcor.de> - 2013-08-28 02:17 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 02:38 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2013-08-28 11:04 +0200
Re: Multiple image preload construct? John Harris <niam@jghnorth.org.uk.invalid> - 2013-08-28 16:26 +0100
csiph-web