Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #10677
| Path | csiph.com!x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net!usenet.pasdenom.info!weretis.net!feeder4.news.weretis.net!newsreader4.netcologne.de!news.netcologne.de!newsfeed.arcor.de!newsspool4.arcor-online.net!news.arcor.de.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset="UTF-8" |
| Message-ID | <1946200.aqSPkdTlGX@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Reply-To | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <cljs@PointedEars.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | Sat, 28 Jan 2012 21:17:21 +0100 |
| User-Agent | KNode/4.4.11 |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 8Bit |
| Subject | Re: Comparing arraies |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | <8dc6b834-cd20-47a5-a085-f4d5e4402c38@c13g2000yqk.googlegroups.com> <4f218d62$0$6578$9b4e6d93@newsspool3.arcor-online.net> <1934880.aqSPkdTlGX@PointedEars.de> <2259221.FRqVoOGUtd@PointedEars.de> <42ZEMLIaWtIPFwSn@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> <1634287.nPeGqDzKj4@PointedEars.de> <uFS4AjEYv9IPFwzF@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
| MIME-Version | 1.0 |
| Lines | 56 |
| NNTP-Posting-Date | 28 Jan 2012 21:17:22 CET |
| NNTP-Posting-Host | 22d34d78.newsspool4.arcor-online.net |
| X-Trace | DXC=YQhe>6[]NbYaAeROF2PWMQ4IUK<Cl32<Q4Fo<]lROoRQ8kF<OcfhCO[C?h^emQ26N[DZm8W4\YJN\;?f@h5gMfb\ObTfU2klSE^XobhA7RNfDZ |
| X-Complaints-To | usenet-abuse@arcor.de |
| Xref | x330-a1.tempe.blueboxinc.net comp.lang.javascript:10677 |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Show key headers only | View raw
John G Harris wrote:
> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>> John G Harris wrote:
>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>> Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn wrote:
>>>>> Instead of the `==' operator, the `===' operator may be used as well,
>>>>> but it is neither supposed to add efficiency nor would it add
>>>>> expressive power (both arguments are of the same type), while it
>>>>> certainly reduces the backwards-compatibility of the entire code.
>>>> _Operands_, not arguments. We are not talking about a function, but
>>>> about an operator.
>>> Operators are also functions. How else would + be defined?
>> You are confusing functions with algorithms. The subject of discussion
>> here is the syntax of the programming language, not the implementation of
>> the syntax.
>
> 1. The syntax specification calls new a keyword and + a punctuator
No, the _lexical grammar_ of ECMAScript (Ed. 5.1) says that `new' is a
keyword (section 7.6.1.1), and that `+' is a punctuator (section 7.7).
The _syntactic grammar_ calls `new' and `+' operators, as in "11.2.2 The
`new' Operator" and "11.6.1 The Addition operator (+)".
"Productions of the lexical and RegExp grammars are distinguished by having
two colons “::” as separating punctuation. […]" (section 5.1.2, last
paragraph).
> Their operands/arguments are called expressions.
Correct for "operands", in the syntactic grammar. Operators do not have
arguments; functions (and by extension to OOP, methods) have them.
> So we aren't discussing the syntax.
Yes, we are. `+' is an operator in the syntax of ECMAScript; it has
operands.
> 2. In a language where you write add(2,3) what would you call 2 and 3 :
> operands or arguments?
I get it now: you are trolling again.
> All that's special about operators is that they are often invoked using
> a non-general format, and they tend to be built into the language.
Wrong.
PointedEars
--
var bugRiddenCrashPronePieceOfJunk = (
navigator.userAgent.indexOf('MSIE 5') != -1
&& navigator.userAgent.indexOf('Mac') != -1
) // Plone, register_function.js:16
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Comparing arraies Archos <raul.san@sent.com> - 2012-01-26 07:23 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-01-26 18:29 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-26 19:50 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-26 19:54 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-27 16:49 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 18:41 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 11:28 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-28 21:17 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-29 14:55 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-29 17:13 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-30 15:27 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-30 19:03 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 15:07 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Dr J R Stockton <reply1205@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 18:51 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-30 12:01 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 11:06 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-31 06:08 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 16:08 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-31 18:32 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-01 17:02 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-01 10:07 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-02 15:10 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-02 11:16 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-07 15:14 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-01 21:45 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-01 13:07 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-01 23:44 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-01 18:22 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-02 23:09 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-03 01:47 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-04 10:34 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Dr J R Stockton <reply1205@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-05 16:47 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-06 15:21 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-04 23:37 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-01-26 23:08 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-01-27 01:42 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 11:41 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-01-26 16:24 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-01-27 08:50 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-01-28 13:45 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 16:21 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-01-27 16:00 +0100
csiph-web