Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.javascript > #10991
| Message-ID | <3325601.CWPS83hRNz@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
|---|---|
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Date | 2012-02-01 21:45 +0100 |
| Subject | Re: Comparing arraies |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript |
| References | (11 earlier) <7a3a197b-9f8c-45a1-92aa-22a3a5d0b297@t15g2000yqi.googlegroups.com> <y$qpggEks8JPFwKk@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> <c8fa17b4-e6f4-47e6-ac4a-9216d96e43a3@o20g2000yqh.googlegroups.com> <ZReDrhI5HBKPFwkH@J.A830F0FF37FB96852AD08924D9443D28E23ED5CD> <dcc3712e-f1d1-41d6-80c1-8821b314034f@s7g2000vby.googlegroups.com> |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
Michael Haufe (TNO) wrote:
> On Jan 31, 10:08 am, John G Harris <j...@nospam.demon.co.uk> wrote:
>> If you want to describe side effects then you have to say that the
>> function is from system state to system state. The input state includes
>> places to hold the arguments, and places holding anything else that
>> affects the result. The output state includes a place to hold the
>> result, if any, and places holding the consequences of side effects,
>> including the effects of an exception.
>
> That is one possible method, but neither the 'function' of JavaScript
> or any other language you've mentioned do this. To repeat what has
> been said earlier: it does not matter what word is used in the
> language, 'function' is not a true function in the mathematical sense,
> nor can all of the operators of the language.
I have to disagree here. That the outcome of a programmatic function, given
the same arguments in the same order, is not necessarily the same always,
and there may be side-effects, is what distinguishes it from a programmatic
operator.
With such a programmatic operator, by definition the outcome must be the
same given the same operand(s) in the same order (or the operator becomes
ambiguous and useless). It is therefore an non-injective *mathematical*
function of the operands, from the sets that the operands may belong to, to
the set of the result type. But it is _not_ a function in the *syntax* of
any programming language, not even C++, because you *need to* tell the two
kinds apart to make sense of the syntax, i. e. to parse the program.
PointedEars
--
realism: HTML 4.01 Strict
evangelism: XHTML 1.0 Strict
madness: XHTML 1.1 as application/xhtml+xml
-- Bjoern Hoehrmann
Back to comp.lang.javascript | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Comparing arraies Archos <raul.san@sent.com> - 2012-01-26 07:23 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-01-26 18:29 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-26 19:50 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-26 19:54 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-27 16:49 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 18:41 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-28 11:28 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-28 21:17 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-29 14:55 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-29 17:13 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-30 15:27 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-30 19:03 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 15:07 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Dr J R Stockton <reply1205@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 18:51 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-30 12:01 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 11:06 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-31 06:08 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-31 16:08 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-31 18:32 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-01 17:02 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-01 10:07 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-02 15:10 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-02 11:16 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-07 15:14 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-01 21:45 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-01 13:07 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-01 23:44 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-01 18:22 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-02 23:09 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-02-03 01:47 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-04 10:34 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Dr J R Stockton <reply1205@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-05 16:47 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies John G Harris <john@nospam.demon.co.uk> - 2012-02-06 15:21 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-02-04 23:37 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-01-26 23:08 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Denis McMahon <denismfmcmahon@gmail.com> - 2012-01-27 01:42 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2012-01-27 11:41 +0100
Re: Comparing arraies Gene Wirchenko <genew@ocis.net> - 2012-01-26 16:24 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-01-27 08:50 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies Dr J R Stockton <reply1204@merlyn.demon.co.uk> - 2012-01-27 21:07 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Evertjan." <exjxw.hannivoort@interxnl.net> - 2012-01-28 13:45 +0000
Re: Comparing arraies "Michael Haufe (TNO)" <tno@thenewobjective.com> - 2012-01-26 16:21 -0800
Re: Comparing arraies Martin Honnen <mahotrash@yahoo.de> - 2012-01-27 16:00 +0100
csiph-web