Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28795
| From | Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: application server, just without the "web" part... |
| Date | 2014-06-20 08:13 -0700 |
| Organization | Canadian Mind Products |
| Message-ID | <snj8q9ttj8fm85ne98mkrnh72j3327qgio@4ax.com> (permalink) |
| References | <slrnln7g7t.bi9.avl@login.logic.tuwien.ac.at> |
On Wed, 14 May 2014 19:16:13 +0000 (UTC), Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> wrote, quoted or indirectly quoted someone who said : >Essentially my application is a couple of separate command-line >utilities, called from users with shell-access (or from unix >shell scripts). > >Startup-time still isn't exactly Java's strong point, and often >enough in my situation the startup time is by far the "longest >pole in the tent". >Adding option -Xshareclasses improved things, but not enough. > >I'd like to consider some kind of application server, that would >run the actual java-code of any number of jobs (of one user) in one >jvm, and with an "interface", that would only allow that one user to >start new jobs. > >Does something like this already exist? > >PS: the actual jobs need to be in Java, because they need certain > Java-libraries for their work. The server would know all relevant > classes beforehand. If the thing that triggers them is written in Java, you still have to fire up the JVM. To get around that you could use Excelsion jet which creates native executables that start quickly. You generate C code for the triggers and compile it. It could send a TCP-IP request to your server code. See http://mindprod.com/products1.html#ECHOSERVER for an absolutely bare bones server you might flesh out. -- Roedy Green Canadian Mind Products http://mindprod.com Software gets slower faster than hardware gets faster. ~ Niklaus Wirth (born: 1934-02-15 age: 80) Wirth's Law
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-05-14 19:16 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-05-14 13:23 -0700
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... leif.roar@invalid.com (Leif Roar Moldskred) - 2014-05-14 16:57 -0500
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-05-15 14:16 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-05-14 19:46 -0400
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2014-05-15 12:25 +0200
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-05-16 21:06 -0400
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-05-15 14:32 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2014-05-16 21:10 -0400
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-05-17 09:46 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-17 07:42 -0400
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-17 08:52 -0400
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-17 09:07 -0400
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Jeff Higgins <jeff@invalid.invalid> - 2014-05-17 09:12 -0400
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Luuk <luuk@invalid.lan> - 2014-05-17 15:35 +0200
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-06-16 18:21 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-05-17 10:49 +0100
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-05-15 14:10 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... "Chris Uppal" <chris.uppal@metagnostic.REMOVE-THIS.org> - 2014-05-17 11:00 +0100
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-03 17:51 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-09-03 18:29 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-03 18:43 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-09-03 19:43 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-04 07:36 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-09-04 12:13 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 00:43 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-09-05 09:14 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-05 10:43 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2014-09-05 21:45 +0000
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-06-20 08:09 -0700
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Roedy Green <see_website@mindprod.com.invalid> - 2014-06-20 08:13 -0700
Re: application server, just without the "web" part... Andreas Leitgeb <avl@auth.logic.tuwien.ac.at> - 2014-09-03 17:33 +0000
csiph-web