Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]

Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39909

Re: The non-technical side of Java

Path csiph.com!weretis.net!feeder8.news.weretis.net!eternal-september.org!reader01.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: The non-technical side of Java
Date Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:39:05 -0000 (UTC)
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 28
Message-ID <slrnttql69.pa7s.avl@logic.at> (permalink)
References <tr1rcm$1tk7m$4@dont-email.me> <tr1sip$1u5a4$1@dont-email.me> <tr1t31$1tk7m$6@dont-email.me> <d68bad5e-8fa2-4fd3-bb54-613dcc1b8d32n@googlegroups.com> <trj0hi$1ekuk$1@dont-email.me> <5032ea52-07e2-442f-9b63-164d2631dc28n@googlegroups.com>
Reply-To avl@logic.at
Injection-Date Fri, 3 Feb 2023 18:39:05 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info reader01.eternal-september.org; posting-host="ac29ea357d775a38849dc630b465dc2a"; logging-data="1642639"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX1+yAzC8x9mydiSuj+PUwzeE"
User-Agent slrn/1.0.3 (Linux)
Cancel-Lock sha1:sM8b8LmG8TAp0PAMwjQ+5U6qM6U=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:39909

Show key headers only | View raw

e.d.pro...@gmail.com <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> wrote:
>> Java 8 is very sticky. Best of luck.
> So far the only issue I've seen with Java 8 is compatibility. At least
> a handful of third party dependencies are requiring Java 11 if not 17,
> so we are recommending using Java 17, I think might get approved soon.
> I have tested all our code on 17 and it literally required no changes. At
> least I haven't seen any security flaws from the dependencies for using the
> latest version they had compiled for Java 8 so far which is the top issue.

Server java is likely mostly unaffected.

Java running on a client pc from webstart was "pita" to upgrade to 11.

I had to do it a few years ago. It kind of worked, but in the 
end, we're still using Java 8 with IcedTeaWeb from a non-Oracle
support vendor now.

The java 11 compiler (running on solaris) no longer knew about
Windows L&F-classes, and most client dialogs had lots of cosmetic
bugs, where Java didn't work well with desktop enlargement settings:
specifically anything larger than "100%" caused spurious pixel lines
to appear over the dialogs.
Some TextBoxes showed just the middle row of pixels of each character,
etc... The reason might have been a mixture of Swing and AWT, but in
Java 8 that same mixture just wasn't ever a problem.

No budget was offered so far to re-try with some Java >11.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-01-27 19:48 -0500
  Re: The non-technical side of Java Jason H <DarthPiriteze@deathstar.gal> - 2023-01-28 01:08 +0000
    Re: The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-01-27 20:17 -0500
      Re: The non-technical side of Java "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2023-01-30 04:07 -0800
        Re: The non-technical side of Java Jason H <DarthPiriteze@deathstar.gal> - 2023-02-03 13:00 +0000
          Re: The non-technical side of Java "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 09:22 -0800
            Re: The non-technical side of Java Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2023-02-03 18:39 +0000
              Re: The non-technical side of Java "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 10:59 -0800
                Re: The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-02-03 14:04 -0500
              Re: The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-02-03 14:01 -0500

csiph-web