Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #39909
| From | Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: The non-technical side of Java |
| Date | 2023-02-03 18:39 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <slrnttql69.pa7s.avl@logic.at> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <tr1sip$1u5a4$1@dont-email.me> <tr1t31$1tk7m$6@dont-email.me> <d68bad5e-8fa2-4fd3-bb54-613dcc1b8d32n@googlegroups.com> <trj0hi$1ekuk$1@dont-email.me> <5032ea52-07e2-442f-9b63-164d2631dc28n@googlegroups.com> |
e.d.pro...@gmail.com <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> wrote: >> Java 8 is very sticky. Best of luck. > So far the only issue I've seen with Java 8 is compatibility. At least > a handful of third party dependencies are requiring Java 11 if not 17, > so we are recommending using Java 17, I think might get approved soon. > I have tested all our code on 17 and it literally required no changes. At > least I haven't seen any security flaws from the dependencies for using the > latest version they had compiled for Java 8 so far which is the top issue. Server java is likely mostly unaffected. Java running on a client pc from webstart was "pita" to upgrade to 11. I had to do it a few years ago. It kind of worked, but in the end, we're still using Java 8 with IcedTeaWeb from a non-Oracle support vendor now. The java 11 compiler (running on solaris) no longer knew about Windows L&F-classes, and most client dialogs had lots of cosmetic bugs, where Java didn't work well with desktop enlargement settings: specifically anything larger than "100%" caused spurious pixel lines to appear over the dialogs. Some TextBoxes showed just the middle row of pixels of each character, etc... The reason might have been a mixture of Swing and AWT, but in Java 8 that same mixture just wasn't ever a problem. No budget was offered so far to re-try with some Java >11.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-01-27 19:48 -0500
Re: The non-technical side of Java Jason H <DarthPiriteze@deathstar.gal> - 2023-01-28 01:08 +0000
Re: The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-01-27 20:17 -0500
Re: The non-technical side of Java "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2023-01-30 04:07 -0800
Re: The non-technical side of Java Jason H <DarthPiriteze@deathstar.gal> - 2023-02-03 13:00 +0000
Re: The non-technical side of Java "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 09:22 -0800
Re: The non-technical side of Java Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2023-02-03 18:39 +0000
Re: The non-technical side of Java "e.d.pro...@gmail.com" <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2023-02-03 10:59 -0800
Re: The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-02-03 14:04 -0500
Re: The non-technical side of Java Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2023-02-03 14:01 -0500
csiph-web