Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38629
| Path | csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail |
|---|---|
| From | Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> |
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? |
| Date | Tue, 2 Oct 2018 16:09:43 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Lines | 24 |
| Message-ID | <pp0mqo$lob$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | <pp09ik$mkd$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Mime-Version | 1.0 |
| Content-Type | text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed |
| Content-Transfer-Encoding | 7bit |
| Injection-Date | Tue, 2 Oct 2018 21:09:46 -0000 (UTC) |
| Injection-Info | reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="c58fd404ed6c4b47c07e1594f2b9fa10"; logging-data="22283"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18mdXaqgL6+gp6fHtslNgZ+" |
| User-Agent | Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 |
| Cancel-Lock | sha1:Z9omjlxbr9qp4QZNmJPbuCKtiMY= |
| In-Reply-To | <pp09ik$mkd$1@news.albasani.net> |
| Content-Language | en-US |
| Xref | csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38629 |
Show key headers only | View raw
On 10/2/2018 12:23, Sebastian wrote: > Hi, > > I'd like to get a working OpenJDK/OpenJFX 11 runtime for Java FX > applications. The last time I looked was with Java 8 when there still > were pre-built overlays available, but those days are gone by. Nowadays, > I seem to be required to download and install OpenJFX to a different > location and change all my batch scripts to use the module path, see > https://openjfx.io/openjfx-docs/#install-javafx. > > Is that really so? Or can I somehow (perhaps via environment variables) > configure OpenJDK 11 to be so liberal as to load OpenJFX using just the > classpath, and include the OpenJFX jars in a place where they are found > automatically? > > -- Sebastian I think setting the module-path and adding the modules modules is the way of the future (such as it is). I think it makes JavaFX an ugly step cousin. I only hope they don't break off Swing too. -- Knute Johnson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2018-10-02 19:23 +0200
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-02 16:09 -0500
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:30 +0000
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-02 23:52 +0000
Changed to: Q for Martin Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-03 11:21 -0500
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-03 23:18 +0000
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-04 09:26 -0500
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-04 20:28 +0000
csiph-web