Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38630
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? |
| Date | 2018-10-02 21:30 +0000 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <pp0o1f$u0q$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <pp09ik$mkd$1@news.albasani.net> <pp0mqo$lob$1@dont-email.me> |
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 16:09:43 -0500, Knute Johnson wrote: > I think setting the module-path and adding the modules modules is the > way of the future (such as it is). I think it makes JavaFX an ugly step > cousin. I only hope they don't break off Swing too. > For those of us who're used to OSen with reasonably modular package management systems this may well bring Java into line with other languages, e.g. C and C++ where the 'language package' contains the compiler and closely associated tools and a fairly small standard library. Then if you want additional capabilities, e.g. graphics, ODBC client, you simply install the relevant packages. Note that some languages, notably Perl and Python, have always worked this way, though they do it via language-specific tools and add-on packages. The Java standard class set has always been somewhat unwieldy. awt, Swing, etc are fair enough, but to include beans, sql, image handling, sound, CORBA, XML and friends in the unitary standard class set is really going a bit far because a lot of sites won't use more than one or two of these. So, to me anyway, making them into separately installable packages makes a lot of sense. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2018-10-02 19:23 +0200
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-02 16:09 -0500
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:30 +0000
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-02 23:52 +0000
Changed to: Q for Martin Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-03 11:21 -0500
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-03 23:18 +0000
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-04 09:26 -0500
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-04 20:28 +0000
csiph-web