Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38631
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? |
| Date | 2018-10-02 23:52 +0000 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <pp10b6$cp4$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <pp09ik$mkd$1@news.albasani.net> <pp0mqo$lob$1@dont-email.me> <pp0o1f$u0q$1@news.albasani.net> |
On Tue, 02 Oct 2018 21:30:23 +0000, Martin Gregorie wrote: > So, to me anyway, making them into separately installable > packages makes a lot of sense. For 'separately installable packages ' read 'add-on modules'. -- Martin | martin at Gregorie | gregorie dot org
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2018-10-02 19:23 +0200
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-02 16:09 -0500
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-02 21:30 +0000
Re: Using OpenJFX with OpenJDK 11 without module path? Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-02 23:52 +0000
Changed to: Q for Martin Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-03 11:21 -0500
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-03 23:18 +0000
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Knute Johnson <nospam@rabbitbrush.frazmtn.com> - 2018-10-04 09:26 -0500
Re: Changed to: Q for Martin Martin Gregorie <martin@mydomain.invalid> - 2018-10-04 20:28 +0000
csiph-web