Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38565

Re: JDK 9 strings very slow

Path csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JDK 9 strings very slow
Date Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:31:51 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 16
Message-ID <pm120r$e1f$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <pjf7p5$mul$1@news.albasani.net> <a015ddd6-0716-467d-9e4a-4dfef8939afd@googlegroups.com> <plv2vr$59l$1@dont-email.me> <plv6ae$6kk$1@news.albasani.net>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:31:55 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="439d20e3e408e3e7b2cc7f745f0b79d0"; logging-data="14383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/KLWdNDpbZXs/GX+qQDrr"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1
Cancel-Lock sha1:IcPS54+pJHaRWUizB53lSdQ6SmA=
In-Reply-To <plv6ae$6kk$1@news.albasani.net>
Content-Language en-US
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38565

Show key headers only | View raw


On 8/26/2018 5:33 PM, j4n bur53 wrote:
> Hi,
> 
> Which kind of algorithm was implemented in
> 8u20 ? There were like 2-4 different
> approaches mentioned in the Change.

     Do you mean the approaches mentioned in the "Alternatives"
section?  It appears to me that they are listed merely to show
that they were considered -- and each is accompanied by a "Why
this wouldn't be good" summary.  That is, the "Alternatives"
are the *rejected* approaches.

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
Eight hundred seventy-seven days to go.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 15:47 +0200
  Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 15:56 +0200
    Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 16:21 +0200
  Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-07-27 10:11 -0400
    Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 16:23 +0200
      Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 16:25 +0200
  Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-26 09:44 -0700
    Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-08-26 16:36 -0400
      Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-26 23:33 +0200
        Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-08-27 10:31 -0400
          Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-27 19:01 +0200
            Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-27 19:17 +0200
              Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-08-27 13:32 -0400
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 10:49 -0700
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-30 18:56 -0700
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-31 00:29 -0700
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-31 09:56 +0200

csiph-web