Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #38501

Re: JDK 9 strings very slow

From j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: JDK 9 strings very slow
Date 2018-07-27 15:56 +0200
Organization albasani.net
Message-ID <pjf8as$l59$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink)
References <pjf7p5$mul$1@news.albasani.net>

Show all headers | View raw


So what they wanted to archive, less GC pressure,
they have traded to more GC pressure when there
are really no latin1 strings involved?

I read Closed / Delivered:
http://openjdk.java.net/jeps/254

Is this a joke?

j4n bur53 schrieb:
> I guess they are kidding:
> 
>      public static byte[] toBytes(int[] val, int off, int len) {
>          byte[] ret = new byte[len];
>          for (int i = 0; i < len; i++) {
>              int cp = val[off++];
>              if (!canEncode(cp)) {
>                  return null;
>              }
>              ret[i] = (byte)cp;
>          }
>          return ret;
>      }
> 
> 
> So the above routine is run for every string,
> to check whether it can be latin encoded.
> 
> But the routine does allocate a byte[len],
> and throws it away when it is not latin.
> 
> Are there any benchmarks for these strings?
> 
> http://hg.openjdk.java.net/jdk9/jdk9/jdk/file/65464a307408/src/java.base/share/classes/java/lang/String.java 
> 

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 15:47 +0200
  Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 15:56 +0200
    Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 16:21 +0200
  Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-07-27 10:11 -0400
    Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 16:23 +0200
      Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-07-27 16:25 +0200
  Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-26 09:44 -0700
    Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-08-26 16:36 -0400
      Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-26 23:33 +0200
        Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-08-27 10:31 -0400
          Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-27 19:01 +0200
            Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-27 19:17 +0200
              Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2018-08-27 13:32 -0400
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-27 10:49 -0700
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-30 18:56 -0700
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow bursejan@gmail.com - 2018-08-31 00:29 -0700
                Re: JDK 9 strings very slow j4n bur53 <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2018-08-31 09:56 +0200

csiph-web