Path: csiph.com!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!reader02.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail From: Eric Sosman Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer Subject: Re: JDK 9 strings very slow Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 10:31:51 -0400 Organization: A noiseless patient Spider Lines: 16 Message-ID: References: Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Injection-Date: Mon, 27 Aug 2018 14:31:55 -0000 (UTC) Injection-Info: reader02.eternal-september.org; posting-host="439d20e3e408e3e7b2cc7f745f0b79d0"; logging-data="14383"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX19/KLWdNDpbZXs/GX+qQDrr" User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.9.1 Cancel-Lock: sha1:IcPS54+pJHaRWUizB53lSdQ6SmA= In-Reply-To: Content-Language: en-US Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:38565 On 8/26/2018 5:33 PM, j4n bur53 wrote: > Hi, > > Which kind of algorithm was implemented in > 8u20 ? There were like 2-4 different > approaches mentioned in the Change. Do you mean the approaches mentioned in the "Alternatives" section? It appears to me that they are listed merely to show that they were considered -- and each is accompanied by a "Why this wouldn't be good" summary. That is, the "Alternatives" are the *rejected* approaches. -- esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid Eight hundred seventy-seven days to go.