Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37399

Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm?

Path csiph.com!news.swapon.de!eternal-september.org!feeder.eternal-september.org!news.eternal-september.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid>
Newsgroups comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm?
Date Tue, 12 Sep 2017 17:08:12 -0400
Organization A noiseless patient Spider
Lines 17
Message-ID <op9ibs$t11$1@dont-email.me> (permalink)
References <137a4648-a4a2-42f9-929e-129787f79650@googlegroups.com> <284544a2-9e8a-4150-a048-c8eb30ddda6a@googlegroups.com> <e326c7af-2371-471d-894d-b4f4ccbbba67@googlegroups.com> <op4tp1$ai6$1@dont-email.me> <uhkerch59h8c5o3p5vqvl90r4vrlp1llt0@4ax.com> <a47ecf53-eaee-4c78-aa22-c3082930b72a@googlegroups.com> <16abd112-1910-42fa-b2ee-c378b9a74ce6@googlegroups.com> <f0e07101-6a9c-488e-864c-d6a778767748@googlegroups.com> <3faa5b20-604d-4b18-b46b-564029238d5e@googlegroups.com> <54d15d3f-f4be-4de8-b0b9-fa2d36ac93dc@googlegroups.com>
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 7bit
Injection-Date Tue, 12 Sep 2017 21:08:12 -0000 (UTC)
Injection-Info reader.eternal-september.org; posting-host="01304c1e3f3c95b08a55697469994dfe"; logging-data="29729"; mail-complaints-to="abuse@eternal-september.org"; posting-account="U2FsdGVkX18VSOiztCcRO9I4IZAmboJe"
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 10.0; WOW64; rv:52.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/52.3.0
In-Reply-To <54d15d3f-f4be-4de8-b0b9-fa2d36ac93dc@googlegroups.com>
X-Antivirus-Status Clean
Content-Language en-US
X-Antivirus AVG (VPS 170912-12, 09/12/2017), Outbound message
Cancel-Lock sha1:a3St5hoScvxU5X3n5OL/O2Mv5XY=
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:37399

Show key headers only | View raw


On 9/12/2017 4:02 PM, Eric Douglas wrote:
> On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 3:43:34 PM UTC-4, lewb...@gmail.com wrote:
>> That "high-cube" designation doesn't indicate an "actual cube" at all. "Cube" there is not a noun or a unit but part of an adjectival phrase meaning that the container has a high cubic capacity. There is no particular "cube" implied. It doesn't represent a particular measure, and high-cube containers are not themselves cubes in shape.
>>
>> So what is an "actual cube"?
> 
> Actual cube meaning the cube that is used to measure all truck trailers.  I'm guessing that means cubic feet.

     Good guess.  Completely wrong, but hey -- for a guess, pretty good.

http://www.tis-gdv.de/tis_e/containe/arten/highcube/highcube.htm
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Intermodal_container#Specifications
http://www.oocl.com/eng/ourservices/containers/containerspecifications/Pages/highcube.aspx

-- 
esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid
Twelve hundred twenty-six days to go.

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 05:05 -0700
  Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-08 07:38 -0700
    Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 08:34 -0700
    Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 11:36 -0700
      Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2017-09-10 22:52 -0400
        Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-09-11 20:24 -0700
          Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 05:05 -0700
          Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 05:11 -0700
            Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-12 10:31 -0700
              Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 10:52 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-12 12:43 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 13:02 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-09-12 17:08 -0400
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 05:21 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-09-13 12:49 -0400
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 11:13 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-13 14:24 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-13 20:35 -0400
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-14 11:26 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-14 11:53 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-14 19:49 +0000
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-14 14:38 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-14 20:34 -0400
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-09-15 09:22 +0000
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-15 20:03 -0400
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-09-19 21:16 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-20 08:58 -0400
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? leif.roar@dimnakorr.com - 2017-09-18 04:14 -0500
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-12 21:50 +0000
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 05:12 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-13 13:07 +0000
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 06:33 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-13 16:37 +0000
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 10:36 -0700
                Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-13 18:54 +0000
            Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-09-19 21:21 -0700
          Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 07:32 -0700
            Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 08:02 -0700
  Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-09-12 11:47 -0400
  Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-15 10:27 +0000

csiph-web