Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37400
| From | Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Big changes are coming to Java SE release cycle |
| Date | 2017-09-12 23:37 +0200 |
| Organization | albasani.net |
| Message-ID | <op9k1u$fp5$1@news.albasani.net> (permalink) |
| References | <op73o3$16nc$1@gioia.aioe.org> <op743n$1764$1@gioia.aioe.org> |
Am 12.09.2017 um 00:52 schrieb Arne Vajhøj: > On 9/11/2017 6:46 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >> https://mreinhold.org/blog/forward-faster >> >> <quote> >> Taking inspiration from the release models used by other >> platforms and by various operating-system distributions, I propose >> that after Java 9 we adopt a strict, time-based model with a new >> feature release every six months, update releases every quarter, and a >> long-term support release every three years. >> >> Feature releases can contain any type of feature, including not >> just new and improved APIs but also language and JVM features. New >> features will be merged only when they’re nearly finished, so that the >> release currently in development is feature-complete at all times. >> Feature releases will ship in March and September of each year, >> starting in March of 2018. >> >> Update releases will be strictly limited to fixes of security >> issues, regressions, and bugs in newer features. Each feature release >> will receive two updates before the next feature release. Update >> releases will ship quarterly in January, April, July, and October, as >> they do today. >> >> Every three years, starting in September of 2018, the feature >> release will be a long-term support release. Updates for these >> releases will be available for at least three years and quite possibly >> longer, depending upon your vendor. >> </quote> > > And: > > http://mail.openjdk.java.net/pipermail/discuss/2017-September/004281.html > > <quote> > - Starting with JDK 9 we'll ship OpenJDK builds under the GPL [6], to > make it easier for developers to deploy Java applications to cloud > environments. We'll initially publish OpenJDK builds for Linux/x64, > followed later by builds for macOS/x64 and Windows/x64. > > - We'll continue to ship proprietary "Oracle JDK" builds, which include > "commercial features" [7] such as Java Flight Recorder and Mission > Control [8], under a click-through binary-code license [9]. Oracle > will continue to offer paid support for these builds. > > - After JDK 9 we'll open-source the commercial features in order to > make the OpenJDK builds more attractive to developers and to reduce > the differences between those builds and the Oracle JDK. This will > take some time, but the ultimate goal is to make OpenJDK and Oracle > JDK builds completely interchangeable. > </quote> > > Arne > > These are very good decisions! Who would have thought I was going to like Oracle's stewardship of Java. This is going entirely in the right direction. -- Sebastian
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Big changes are coming to Java SE release cycle Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-11 18:46 -0400
Re: Big changes are coming to Java SE release cycle Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-11 18:52 -0400
Re: Big changes are coming to Java SE release cycle Sebastian <nowhere@nirvana.org> - 2017-09-12 23:37 +0200
Re: Big changes are coming to Java SE release cycle Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-12 20:01 -0400
csiph-web