Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #37401
| From | Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? |
| Date | 2017-09-12 21:50 +0000 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <op9kqf$jbd$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (5 earlier) <a47ecf53-eaee-4c78-aa22-c3082930b72a@googlegroups.com> <16abd112-1910-42fa-b2ee-c378b9a74ce6@googlegroups.com> <f0e07101-6a9c-488e-864c-d6a778767748@googlegroups.com> <3faa5b20-604d-4b18-b46b-564029238d5e@googlegroups.com> <54d15d3f-f4be-4de8-b0b9-fa2d36ac93dc@googlegroups.com> |
On Tue, 12 Sep 2017 13:02:31 -0700, Eric Douglas wrote: > On Tuesday, September 12, 2017 at 3:43:34 PM UTC-4, lewb...@gmail.com > wrote: >> That "high-cube" designation doesn't indicate an "actual cube" at all. >> "Cube" there is not a noun or a unit but part of an adjectival phrase >> meaning that the container has a high cubic capacity. There is no >> particular "cube" implied. It doesn't represent a particular measure, >> and high-cube containers are not themselves cubes in shape. >> >> So what is an "actual cube"? > > Actual cube meaning the cube that is used to measure all truck trailers. > I'm guessing that means cubic feet. I notice you haven't mentioned the external shape or weight of any of these packages, which surprises me, since the shape could well affect the packing density you can achieve in a container just as the weight could cause a load of dense packages to exceed the permitted maximum weight for a container. -- martin@ | Martin Gregorie gregorie. | Essex, UK org |
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 05:05 -0700
Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-08 07:38 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 08:34 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-08 11:36 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Joshua Cranmer đ§ <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2017-09-10 22:52 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-09-11 20:24 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 05:05 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 05:11 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-12 10:31 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 10:52 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-12 12:43 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 13:02 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-09-12 17:08 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 05:21 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-09-13 12:49 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 11:13 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-13 14:24 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-13 20:35 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-14 11:26 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-14 11:53 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-14 19:49 +0000
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? lewbloch@gmail.com - 2017-09-14 14:38 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-14 20:34 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Andreas Leitgeb <avl@logic.at> - 2017-09-15 09:22 +0000
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-15 20:03 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-09-19 21:16 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Arne VajhĂžj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2017-09-20 08:58 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? leif.roar@dimnakorr.com - 2017-09-18 04:14 -0500
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-12 21:50 +0000
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 05:12 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-13 13:07 +0000
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 06:33 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-13 16:37 +0000
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-13 10:36 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-13 18:54 +0000
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2017-09-19 21:21 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 07:32 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2017-09-12 08:02 -0700
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2017-09-12 11:47 -0400
Re: Is there already an easy fit algorithm? Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2017-09-15 10:27 +0000
csiph-web