Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #33067
| From | Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: Java primitive variable objects |
| Date | 2015-11-09 22:12 -0500 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <n1rn6o$qov$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
| References | (3 earlier) <n1mf48$anc$2@speranza.aioe.org> <2fa8e907-f6b4-4bd5-b6cb-304b25c5e754@googlegroups.com> <n1re9r$rik$1@speranza.aioe.org> <n1rh0d$gf7$1@dont-email.me> <n1rjnc$gme$1@dont-email.me> |
On 11/9/2015 9:10 PM, Martin Gregorie wrote: > On Mon, 09 Nov 2015 20:26:53 -0500, Jerry Stuckle wrote: > >> On 11/9/2015 7:38 PM, Arne Vajhøj wrote: >>> Universities are supposed to teach students something that will help >>> them through a career of 40-45 years. >>> >>> >> That's hard to do in any of the sciences today. The world is changing >> too quickly. >> > Yes, but its what a *University* should be doing - and apparently a > number of US State universities weren't doing it in the 70s and haven't > changed their ways 20 years later, as confirmed by ED. The question is: > have they changed since then. > It's hard for a university to teach students something that won't even exist for 20 years. For instance, when I was in college, there was no C, much less C++. So how was my university supposed to teach it? > In NZ, where I got my degree, and in the UK computer science degrees have > certainly taught programming languages, but as tools that let students > get hands-on experience of the non language-specific skills that the > degree is meant to teach them. Things such as the elements of hardware > and software architecture, systems analysis principles (not how to use > SSADM, Bootch or Rational Rose), modular program decomposition (not how > to look up design patterns). IOW, they're teaching general principles and > problem solving - skills which *can* serve you well throughout a career. > We learned that, also. But we didn't learn object oriented programming, for instance - another concept which didn't exist at the time. The same with relational databases, SQL and any number of concepts we use regularly today. > I'd call any school that simply taught coding in a programming language a > polytech: its certainly not a University, at least not the sort of > University I attended. > It wasn't the type I attended, either. >>> At that time I think it both made sense and was common to use Pascal or >>> C++. >>> > Yes, Pascal has always been a popular teaching language. In addition to > the reasons already given, algorithms expressed in it are very easy to > read by anybody who knows any block-structured language. Take a look at > Sedgewick: "Algorithms" - a book that belongs in any serious programmer's > library. It uses Pascal and I know, from personal experience that I can > transcribe its algorithms directly into C. It should be equally easy to > transcribe its Pascal code into Java, C++ or Python. > >> PASCAL has never been big in business. C++ is to some extent, but still >> not as popular as C. >> > I think it depends what you're doing, though I agree about Pascal. If > you're writing, say, business domain-specific message switches, ATM or > EFTPOS network controllers or almost any very high volume application > you'll probably choose C with Java and C++ in 2nd rank due to their > generally larger support libraries and related overheads. > >>> Even though COBOLwas still very popular at that time, then it was >>> obvious that it would not stay that way. >>> >>> >> It is still the most commonly used language in the world. >> > And, within the application domain it was designed for, it may still be > the best. As I've said before, how many lines would it take in any other > language to format a financial in the way described by > > 77 MY-VALUE COMP SYNC RIGHT PIC $$,$$$,$$0.99DB BLANK WHEN ZERO. > > Or, take it 4 more places to each the left and right, yet maintain accuracy. -- ================== Remove the "x" from my email address Jerry Stuckle jstucklex@attglobal.net ==================
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 10:11 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-02 14:15 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-02 13:03 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-02 16:29 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2015-11-02 22:46 +0100
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jan Burse <janburse@fastmail.fm> - 2015-11-02 22:52 +0100
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-02 17:47 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Joerg Meier <joergmmeier@arcor.de> - 2015-11-05 22:19 +0100
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-05 13:31 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-07 22:21 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 04:52 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 08:54 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 07:27 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 10:51 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 08:28 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 11:57 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 10:13 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Sosman <esosman@comcast-dot-net.invalid> - 2015-11-09 13:28 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 14:53 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Nigel Wade <nmw@ion.le.ac.uk> - 2015-11-10 09:27 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects "Jeffrey H. Coffield" <jeffrey@digitalsynergyinc.com> - 2015-11-09 10:44 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-09 18:59 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 15:02 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-09 22:57 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 19:16 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-09 20:55 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 22:13 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-09 20:40 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 22:23 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-09 14:00 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-09 07:18 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-09 20:43 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-09 19:38 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 20:26 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-10 02:10 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-09 22:12 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-10 13:01 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-10 12:23 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 10:10 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 22:08 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-10 20:05 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 13:21 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Martin Gregorie <martin@address-in-sig.invalid> - 2015-11-10 23:30 +0000
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-10 20:58 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Gene Wirchenko <genew@telus.net> - 2015-11-10 22:30 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 21:58 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 21:56 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-10 22:19 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-11-10 22:42 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Jerry Stuckle <jstucklex@attglobal.net> - 2015-11-10 23:07 -0500
Re: Java primitive variable objects Eric Douglas <e.d.programmer@gmail.com> - 2015-11-10 06:06 -0800
Re: Java primitive variable objects Lew <lewbloch@gmail.com> - 2015-11-16 14:47 -0800
csiph-web