Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]


Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #32531

Re: questions re Javascript

Path csiph.com!news.mixmin.net!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk>
Newsgroups comp.lang.javascript, comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject Re: questions re Javascript
Date Fri, 4 Sep 2015 19:40:35 -0400
Organization Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines 43
Message-ID <msda5l$agg$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References <2b531f48-fff9-4c73-a116-22a3f110e919@googlegroups.com> <020920150828500988%timstreater@greenbee.net> <java-and-javascript-20150902121750@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mscc3f$apc$1@dont-email.me> <to-do-20150904163124@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>
NNTP-Posting-Host NIM2IeSPVd0kE3mU1mieXw.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version 1.0
Content-Type text/plain; charset=windows-1252; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding 8bit
X-Complaints-To abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent Mozilla/5.0 (Windows NT 6.1; WOW64; rv:38.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/38.2.0
X-Notice Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref csiph.com comp.lang.javascript:28637 comp.lang.java.programmer:32531

Cross-posted to 2 groups.

Show key headers only | View raw


On 9/4/2015 11:33 AM, Stefan Ram wrote:
> =?UTF-8?Q?Joshua_Cranmer_=f0=9f=90=a7?= <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> writes:
>> other. It's like saying English and French are similar, because they
>> share the same grammatical constructs and many words are cognates.
>
>    What I objected to was the typical wording
>
>        »JavaScript /has nothing to do/ with Java.«.
>
>    To me, it would be disputable too when one would say,
>
>        »English has nothing to do with French.«.

I think the term "has nothing to do with" should be seen in context.

If it is a thread about the evolution of languages and how they
relate, then it is not a good statement.

If it is a thread with a specific question about
syntax/semantics/library, then I think it is a pretty good
statement.

Any attempt to answer a Java question based on JavaScript
or a JavaScript question based on Java is very bad, because
the risk of the answer being wrong is huge.

And it is actually the same about English and French.

If one is discussing history then certainly French
influenced English after 1066 and in modern times
English has probably influenced French a little bit as
well (even though they try hard to create French
equivalent words).

But if it is a question about grammar rules and
pronunciation, then it would most likely result in
incorrect answers to try and answer question for
one based on the other.

Arne


Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread


Thread

Re: questions re Javascript Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:09 -0500
  Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 16:37 +0100
    Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 22:51 +0100
      Re: questions re Javascript Eternal Hope <laughingspam99@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 20:29 +0100
  Re: questions re Javascript "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-09-04 18:17 +0200
  Re: questions re Javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-09-04 19:40 -0400
    Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 09:47 +0200
      Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 22:16 +0200

csiph-web