Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #32523
| From | Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript, comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: questions re Javascript |
| Date | 2015-09-04 16:37 +0100 |
| Message-ID | <040920151637554925%timstreater@greenbee.net> (permalink) |
| References | <2b531f48-fff9-4c73-a116-22a3f110e919@googlegroups.com> <020920150828500988%timstreater@greenbee.net> <java-and-javascript-20150902121750@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mscc3f$apc$1@dont-email.me> <to-do-20150904163124@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
In article <to-do-20150904163124@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de>, Stefan Ram <ram@zedat.fu-berlin.de> wrote: >=?UTF-8?Q?Joshua_Cranmer_=f0=9f=90=a7?= <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> writes: >>other. It's like saying English and French are similar, because they >>share the same grammatical constructs and many words are cognates. > > What I objected to was the typical wording > > »JavaScript /has nothing to do/ with Java.«. > > To me, it would be disputable too when one would say, > > »English has nothing to do with French.«. > > Also, it depends on the point of view. Compared with a > language like »Archi«, which has 1.5 million forms of verb > endings and more than 150 phonemes, English and French > suddenly appear to be more similar. Given that the OP didn't seem to know very much, at this point in his learning process it is *much* *better* to say that these languages are not related. Then he can get on. He can learn a more nuanced lesson later on. All you and similar posters are likely to do at this stage, with your pedantry, is to confuse him. -- "Once you adopt the unix paradigm, the variants cease to be a problem - you bitch, of course, but that's because bitching is fun, unlike M$ OS's, where bitching is required to keep your head from exploding." - S Stremler in afc
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: questions re Javascript Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:09 -0500
Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 16:37 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 22:51 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript Eternal Hope <laughingspam99@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 20:29 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-09-04 18:17 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-09-04 19:40 -0400
Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 09:47 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 22:16 +0200
csiph-web