Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #32539
| From | Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.javascript, comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Re: questions re Javascript |
| Followup-To | comp.lang.javascript |
| Date | 2015-09-05 09:47 +0200 |
| Organization | PointedEars Software (PES) |
| Message-ID | <3247094.1kJgyrEJG5@PointedEars.de> (permalink) |
| References | (1 earlier) <020920150828500988%timstreater@greenbee.net> <java-and-javascript-20150902121750@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <mscc3f$apc$1@dont-email.me> <to-do-20150904163124@ram.dialup.fu-berlin.de> <msda5l$agg$1@speranza.aioe.org> |
Cross-posted to 2 groups.
Followups directed to: comp.lang.javascript
[F'up2 comp.lang.javascript] Arne Vajhøj wrote: > On 9/4/2015 11:33 AM, Stefan Ram wrote: >> What I objected to was the typical wording >> >> »JavaScript /has nothing to do/ with Java.«. >> >> To me, it would be disputable too when one would say, >> >> »English has nothing to do with French.«. > > I think the term "has nothing to do with" should be seen in context. > > If it is a thread about the evolution of languages and how they > relate, then it is not a good statement. > > If it is a thread with a specific question about > syntax/semantics/library, then I think it is a pretty good > statement. The statement should be modified to say “has *little* to do with Java” in that context because JavaScript was intentionally designed to resemble Java syntactically and semantically. Please stop crossposting without Followup-To. A discussion belongs only into to *one* newsgroup; in this case, comp.lang.javascript. -- PointedEars FAQ: <http://PointedEars.de/faq> | SVN: <http://PointedEars.de/wsvn/> Twitter: @PointedEars2 | ES Matrix: <http://PointedEars.de/es-matrix> Please do not cc me. / Bitte keine Kopien per E-Mail.
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Re: questions re Javascript Joshua Cranmer 🐧 <Pidgeot18@verizon.invalid> - 2015-09-04 10:09 -0500
Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 16:37 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript Tim Streater <timstreater@greenbee.net> - 2015-09-04 22:51 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript Eternal Hope <laughingspam99@gmail.com> - 2015-09-05 20:29 +0100
Re: questions re Javascript "Evertjan." <exxjxw.hannivoort@inter.nl.net> - 2015-09-04 18:17 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Arne Vajhøj <arne@vajhoej.dk> - 2015-09-04 19:40 -0400
Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 09:47 +0200
Re: questions re Javascript Thomas 'PointedEars' Lahn <PointedEars@web.de> - 2015-09-05 22:16 +0200
csiph-web