Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28881

Re: Assumed final?

Path	csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From	Peter <mcheung63@gmail.com>
Newsgroups	comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject	Re: Assumed final?
Date	Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:54:32 +0800
Organization	Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines	17
Message-ID	<lou416$3a5$1@speranza.aioe.org> (permalink)
References	<los6o2$e1d$1@dont-email.me> <losa30$abh$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host	EfNlhfDfAo9+0xhze4Avzg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version	1.0
Content-Type	text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding	8bit
X-Complaints-To	abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent	Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
X-Notice	Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref	csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:28881

Show key headers only | View raw

於 1/7/14上午2:25, markspace 提到:
> On 6/30/2014 10:28 AM, Knute Johnson wrote:
>
>> So it appears that the Java 8 compiler has gotten smarter or I haven't
>> been paying enough attention :-).
>>
>
> Gotten smarter, I think.  This was added for Java 8 lambdas.  So now
> instead of having to declare you variables final for anonymous inner
> classes/lambdas, the compiler can figure out if it is "effectively
> final" (note the text of your error message) and just assume you meant
> "final".
>
> Handy for lambdas because it makes them less verbose in some situations
> and a bit more like their aged cousins, closures.

nice

Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Previous in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread

Thread

Assumed final? Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-06-30 10:28 -0700
  Re: Assumed final? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-06-30 11:25 -0700
    Re: Assumed final? Peter <mcheung63@gmail.com> - 2014-07-01 18:54 +0800

csiph-web