Path: csiph.com!v102.xanadu-bbs.net!xanadu-bbs.net!feeder.erje.net!eu.feeder.erje.net!newsfeed.datemas.de!rt.uk.eu.org!aioe.org!.POSTED!not-for-mail
From: Peter <mcheung63@gmail.com>
Newsgroups: comp.lang.java.programmer
Subject: Re: Assumed final?
Date: Tue, 01 Jul 2014 18:54:32 +0800
Organization: Aioe.org NNTP Server
Lines: 17
Message-ID: <lou416$3a5$1@speranza.aioe.org>
References: <los6o2$e1d$1@dont-email.me> <losa30$abh$1@dont-email.me>
NNTP-Posting-Host: EfNlhfDfAo9+0xhze4Avzg.user.speranza.aioe.org
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8; format=flowed
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit
X-Complaints-To: abuse@aioe.org
User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (Macintosh; Intel Mac OS X 10.9; rv:24.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/24.6.0
X-Notice: Filtered by postfilter v. 0.8.2
Xref: csiph.com comp.lang.java.programmer:28881

於 1/7/14上午2:25, markspace 提到:
> On 6/30/2014 10:28 AM, Knute Johnson wrote:
>
>> So it appears that the Java 8 compiler has gotten smarter or I haven't
>> been paying enough attention :-).
>>
>
> Gotten smarter, I think.  This was added for Java 8 lambdas.  So now
> instead of having to declare you variables final for anonymous inner
> classes/lambdas, the compiler can figure out if it is "effectively
> final" (note the text of your error message) and just assume you meant
> "final".
>
> Handy for lambdas because it makes them less verbose in some situations
> and a bit more like their aged cousins, closures.

nice