Groups | Search | Server Info | Keyboard shortcuts | Login | Register [http] [https] [nntp] [nntps]
Groups > comp.lang.java.programmer > #28877
| From | Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> |
|---|---|
| Newsgroups | comp.lang.java.programmer |
| Subject | Assumed final? |
| Date | 2014-06-30 10:28 -0700 |
| Organization | A noiseless patient Spider |
| Message-ID | <los6o2$e1d$1@dont-email.me> (permalink) |
I always thought the code below would have generated a error on compile
that frame wasn't final. But I see when I compile it now with JDK 8
that there is no error unless I make another assignment to frame. If I
uncomment the frame = null; statement, then I get the error;
C:\Users\Knute Johnson>javac test9.java
test9.java:17: error: local variables referenced from an inner class
must be final or effectively final
frame.dispose();
^
1 error
So it appears that the Java 8 compiler has gotten smarter or I haven't
been paying enough attention :-).
import java.awt.*;
import java.awt.event.*;
import javax.swing.*;
public class test9 extends JPanel {
public test9() {
setPreferredSize(new Dimension(320,180));
setBackground(Color.BLUE);
}
public static void main(String... args) {
EventQueue.invokeLater(new Runnable() {
public void run() {
JFrame frame = new JFrame("test9");
frame.addWindowListener(new WindowAdapter() {
public void windowClosing(WindowEvent we) {
frame.dispose();
}
});
frame.add(new test9(),BorderLayout.CENTER);
frame.pack();
frame.setVisible(true);
//frame = null;
}
});
}
}
--
Knute Johnson
Back to comp.lang.java.programmer | Previous | Next — Next in thread | Find similar | Unroll thread
Assumed final? Knute Johnson <eternal@knutejohnson.com> - 2014-06-30 10:28 -0700
Re: Assumed final? markspace <markspace@nospam.nospam> - 2014-06-30 11:25 -0700
Re: Assumed final? Peter <mcheung63@gmail.com> - 2014-07-01 18:54 +0800
csiph-web